From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265314AbUHHN3J (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:29:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265331AbUHHN3J (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:29:09 -0400 Received: from mproxy.gmail.com ([216.239.56.247]:46103 "EHLO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265314AbUHHN3G (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:29:06 -0400 Message-ID: <944a037704080806294224cab7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:29:02 -0400 From: Michael Guterl To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: USB troubles in rc2 Cc: David Brownell , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Luis Miguel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20Garc=FD?= Mancebo" , Greg KH , LKML , akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah I have to work today, Sunday!?!? After I get off if I have time I'll start messing with the bk-usb and bk-acpi patches. On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:20:43 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Michael Guterl wrote: > > > What if Alan's assumptions that it is in ACPI and not USB are correct? > > Personally I don't know enough to handle really any of the tasks you > > suggested. I figured the fact that reverting bk-acpi.patch and > > bk-usb.patch would throw up some kind of red flag, that something in > > there was maybe messed up and merged in. > > It was a guess, not an assumption! > > You could test this guess by reverting bk-usb.patch while leaving > bk-acpi.patch intact. > > Alan Stern > >