From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:53:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:53:35 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:31219 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:53:21 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: To: kees Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Delivery reports about your email [FAILED(1)] (fwd) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 12:53:00 +0100 Message-ID: <9456.990359580@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kees@schoen.nl said: > Why? > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Some explanations/translations for these reports > can be found at: > http://www.zmailer.org/reports.html > ->> 550-Open relay - see http://www.orbs.org/verify.php3?address=212.153.111.69 > ->> 550 mail from 212.153.111.69 rejected: administrative prohibition (host is blacklisted) This means that: The mail from 212.153.111.69 was rejected because of an administrative prohibition - that host is blacklisted. This is probably because it's an open relay. See http://www.orbs.org/verify.php3?address=212.153.111.69 If you encounter other pieces of plain English would you would like translated into... er, ... plain English, please don't hesitate to go away and ask somewhere more appropriate. -- dwmw2