From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762123AbXKPRQM (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:16:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752258AbXKPRP6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:15:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37890 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753555AbXKPRP6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:15:58 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20071116163645.GA7855@fluff.org.uk> References: <20071116163645.GA7855@fluff.org.uk> <20071116134105.3823.66507.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20071116134100.3823.12894.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <9004.1195229483@redhat.com> To: Ben Dooks Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:15:20 +0000 Message-ID: <9555.1195233320@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ben Dooks wrote: > Often write protect on flash chips is a seperate pin that disables > the cell writing circuitry, not the nWE pin. That may be true, but the board documentation in this particular case doesn't list any way of write-enabling the flash. I have another, different board based on the same CPU that does have a write enable for its bootprom. David