From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
andrzej.hajda@intel.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
rfoss@kernel.org, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
mripard@kernel.org, jonas@kwiboo.se, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, tzimmermann@suse.de,
airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, a-bhatia1@ti.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [v4,1/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: Fix mode_valid hook
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 22:04:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <955a6d94-9a4c-4f7d-974c-819261579f14@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531133324.GA1715839@ravnborg.org>
Hi, Jayesh
On 5/31/24 21:33, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Jayesh,
>
>>> +
>>> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
>>> .attach = sii902x_bridge_attach,
>>> .mode_set = sii902x_bridge_mode_set,
>>> @@ -516,6 +529,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
>>> .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_destroy_state,
>>> .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = sii902x_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
>>> .atomic_check = sii902x_bridge_atomic_check,
>>> + .mode_valid = sii902x_bridge_mode_valid,
>
> As you have the possibility to test the driver, it would be nice with a
> follow-up patch that replaces the use of enable() / disable() with the
> atomic counterparts.
>
> enable() / disable() are deprecated, so it is nice to reduce their use.
I agree with Sam.
Please using atomic uniformally with a follow-up patch, the mixed
using of atomic API and non atomic API is a little bit confusing IMO.
> Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 9:29 [PATCH v4 0/2] Add mode_valid and atomic_check hooks for sii902x bridge Jayesh Choudhary
2024-05-30 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: Fix mode_valid hook Jayesh Choudhary
2024-05-30 23:30 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-31 13:20 ` [v4,1/2] " Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-31 13:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-05-31 14:04 ` Sui Jingfeng [this message]
2024-06-12 5:21 ` Jayesh Choudhary
2024-05-30 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/bridge: Add pixel clock check in atomic_check Jayesh Choudhary
2024-05-30 9:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-30 9:50 ` Jayesh Choudhary
2024-05-31 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Add mode_valid and atomic_check hooks for sii902x bridge Sui Jingfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=955a6d94-9a4c-4f7d-974c-819261579f14@linux.dev \
--to=sui.jingfeng@linux.dev \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=a-bhatia1@ti.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=j-choudhary@ti.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox