From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Shawn Wang <shawnwang@linux.alibaba.com>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Only show tasks' pids in current pid namespace
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:43:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95fca7d1-d473-e9e2-b6c8-c4ae3d44d2df@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116071246.97717-1-shawnwang@linux.alibaba.com>
Hi Shawn,
On 1/15/2023 11:12 PM, Shawn Wang wrote:
> When writing a task id to the "tasks" file in an rdtgroup,
> rdtgroup_tasks_write() treats the pid as a number in the current pid
> namespace. But when reading the "tasks" file, rdtgroup_tasks_show() shows
> the list of global pids from the init namespace. If current pid namespace
> is not the init namespace, pids in "tasks" will be confusing and incorrect.
>
> To be more robust, let the "tasks" file only show pids in the current pid
> namespace.
>
Is it possible to elaborate more on the use case that this is aiming to
address? It is unexpected to me that resource management is approached from
within a container. My expectation is that the resource management and monitoring
is done from the host.
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Wang <shawnwang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 5993da21d822..9e97ae24c159 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -718,11 +718,15 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_tasks_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> static void show_rdt_tasks(struct rdtgroup *r, struct seq_file *s)
> {
> struct task_struct *p, *t;
> + pid_t pid;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
> - if (is_closid_match(t, r) || is_rmid_match(t, r))
> - seq_printf(s, "%d\n", t->pid);
> + if (is_closid_match(t, r) || is_rmid_match(t, r)) {
> + pid = task_pid_vnr(t);
> + if (pid)
> + seq_printf(s, "%d\n", pid);
> + }
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
This looks like it would solve the stated problem. Does it slow down
reading a tasks file in a measurable way?
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 7:12 [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Only show tasks' pids in current pid namespace Shawn Wang
2023-02-15 21:43 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2023-03-15 15:06 ` Shawn Wang
2023-03-16 21:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-16 22:18 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95fca7d1-d473-e9e2-b6c8-c4ae3d44d2df@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shawnwang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox