From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753970Ab0CYS3J (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:29:09 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:57988 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753661Ab0CYS3H (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:29:07 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Marcelo Roberto Jimenez , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, Wolfram Sang , Dominik Brodowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: pcmcia: fix checkpatch.pl issues in soc_common.c In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:19:29 +0300." <4BAB38B1.8080404@ru.mvista.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1269471898-26301-1-git-send-email-mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br> <1269471898-26301-2-git-send-email-mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br> <20100324230729.GA21359@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4BAB38B1.8080404@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1269541561_3923P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:26:01 -0400 Message-ID: <9610.1269541561@localhost> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 128.173.14.107 localhost Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail: UCE(50) X-Junkmail-Info: (45) HELO_LOCALHOST X-Junkmail-Status: score=50/50, host=dagger.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=bulk(0), refid=str=0001.0A02020A.4BAB9D45.00E0,ss=3,sh,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-09-22 00:05:22, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1269541561_3923P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:19:29 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov said: > I'd disagree in this case. Anybody will hardly grep for "mask: > %s%s%s%s%s%sflags: %s%s%s%s%s%s". However, egrep 'mask: .*flags: ' is quite plausible. --==_Exmh_1269541561_3923P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFLq6q5cC3lWbTT17ARAhj0AKDLRN8K9V67SKHKiokHG2Knw/+l9gCfWm78 Yy8mKyjThNBl8PkKR5tLh7c= =+F89 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1269541561_3923P--