From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36B9C433DF for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E9221E5 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com header.i=@samsung.com header.b="I6hCyl8D" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726429AbgHFXSF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:18:05 -0400 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:27694 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726346AbgHFXSF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:18:05 -0400 Received: from epcas1p4.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.48]) by mailout2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200806231802epoutp0268d786f38c43c34f9490125fb4fcfcc8~o0QP-BRSc1535715357epoutp02R for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:18:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.samsung.com 20200806231802epoutp0268d786f38c43c34f9490125fb4fcfcc8~o0QP-BRSc1535715357epoutp02R DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1596755883; bh=qepv6a95XKs0GXbFbCftAQvu650mnE1KSc7vk4o8Kps=; h=Subject:Reply-To:From:To:CC:In-Reply-To:Date:References:From; b=I6hCyl8D5+y+Hpa44/4D9sBvXOUL6yFoI3RbgWsEU9vkOmnFh9OZZqwuQHoEn+418 k+yMrEax4y5zp8wegtM6ZUBBetBZ04gVDzlk5RsvdJ3yzeoHn6CysHqTOkOQgJXPRn qQzMemYpaJwuM/RKM4vGawMdJo1UptuwD+m7MK9I= Received: from epcpadp2 (unknown [182.195.40.12]) by epcas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200806231802epcas1p1b3ef4ff58eea9597465a8a6e8db93164~o0QPf4l8j2976929769epcas1p12; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:18:02 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 0/4] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Reply-To: daejun7.park@samsung.com From: Daejun Park To: Avri Altman , Bean Huo , Daejun Park , "jejb@linux.ibm.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" , "beanhuo@micron.com" , "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" , "cang@codeaurora.org" , "bvanassche@acm.org" , "tomas.winkler@intel.com" , ALIM AKHTAR CC: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sang-yoon Oh , Sung-Jun Park , yongmyung lee , Jinyoung CHOI , Adel Choi , BoRam Shin X-Priority: 3 X-Content-Kind-Code: NORMAL In-Reply-To: X-CPGS-Detection: blocking_info_exchange X-Drm-Type: N,general X-Msg-Generator: Mail X-Msg-Type: PERSONAL X-Reply-Demand: N Message-ID: <963815509.21596755882463.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 08:15:37 +0900 X-CMS-MailID: 20200806231537epcms2p504703655baf8e6962ea099fb907ab9bc Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Sendblock-Type: AUTO_CONFIDENTIAL X-CPGSPASS: Y X-CPGSPASS: Y X-Hop-Count: 3 X-CMS-RootMailID: 20200806073257epcms2p61564ed62e02fc42fc3c2b18fa92a038d References: <231786897.01596704281715.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> <7c59c7abf7b00c368228b3096e1bea8c9e2b2e80.camel@gmail.com> <39c546268abead68f4c00f17dc47c1597f3e0273.camel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Avri, > > > > On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 10:12 +0000, Avri Altman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > we didn't see you Acked-by in the pathwork, would you like to add > > > > them? > > > > Just for reminding us that you have agreed to mainline this series > > > > patchset. > > > > > > I acked it - https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0669baeb-5ba5764e-066831a4-0cc47a30d446-27c87d7023437946&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144660.html > > > And asked Martin to move forward - > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5035541-a8cf99e4-f502de0e-0cc47a30d446-b2b42329eddc02dc&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144738.html > > > Which he did, and got some sparse errors: > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=242040ce-79ec8c6b-2421cb81-0cc47a30d446-4d1c0f96a36b8f4d&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144977.html > > > Which I asked Daejun to fix - > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=44587fa8-1994b30d-4459f4e7-0cc47a30d446-d01ce202f9a3c6b5&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144987.html > > > > > > For the next chain of events I guess you can follow by yourself. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Avri > > > > Avri > > Sorry for making you confusing. yes, I knew that, and following. > > I mean Acked-by tag in the patchset, then we see your acked in the > > patchwork, and let others know that you acked it, rather than going > > backtrack history email. > > > > Hi Daejun > > I think you can add Avri's Acked-by tag in your patchset, just for > > quickly moving forward and reminding. > Ahhh - One moment please - > While rebasing the v8 on my platform, I noticed some substantial changes since v6. > e.g. the hpb lun ref counting isn't there anymore, as well as some more stuff. > While those changes might be only for the best, I think any tested-by tag should be re-assign. In this version, the HPB is no more loadable module, it is sticked with UFS-core driver. So, I removed reference counter for HPB. > Anyway, as for myself, I am not planning to put any more time in this, > until there is a clear decision where this series is going to. > > Martin - Are you considering to merge the HPB feature eventually to mainline kernel? > > Thanks, > Avri > > > > thanks, > > Bean > > Thanks, Daejun