The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Ravi Kumar Bandi" <ravib@amazon.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,  LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: Check IORESOURCE_DISABLED in resource mmap handler
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 12:43:23 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <963819fa-1177-7e27-da34-b79013575b09@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512091848.GA1539393@rocinante>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1706 bytes --]

On Tue, 12 May 2026, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> > pci_mmap_resource() does not check IORESOURCE_DISABLED before mapping
> > a PCI BAR resource into userspace. This allows new mmaps to succeed
> > even after a device has been marked disabled or soft-unplugged by the
> > driver to prevent further access.
> 
> Which driver disables resources?  Would this be some Amazon-specific thing
> you are trying to fix?  Or are you just manually disabling a given device
> using sysfs, or something like this?
> 
> For "soft-unplugged" device we have pci_dev_set_disconnected(), but this
> does not check current flags set.
> 
> What is your use case here?
> 
> > Add the check to return -ENODEV when the resource is disabled, blocking
> > new userspace mmaps of BAR resources after device removal.
> > 
> > Tested by marking the PCI BAR resource as disabled and verifying that
> > a subsequent mmap attempt fails with -ENODEV.
> 
> Can you explain how did you do this?
> 
> > @@ -1089,6 +1089,9 @@ static int pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, const struct bin_attribute *a
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > +	if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> 
> This probably would be better if it checked IORESOURCE_DISABLED and
> IORESOURCE_UNSET, but then probably using resource_assigned() would
> be even better.

Yes, resource_assigned() makes more sense.

When considering Krzysztof's sysfs rework series in pci/sysfs, this all 
should be handled in .is_visible and not in pci_mmap_resource().

Also (FYI), alpha has its own pci_mmap_resource() (IIRC, it still has it 
even after Krzysztof's series).

-- 
 i.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12  8:43 [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: Check IORESOURCE_DISABLED in resource mmap handler Ravi Kumar Bandi
2026-05-12  9:26 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-05-12  9:43   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-05-12  9:54     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=963819fa-1177-7e27-da34-b79013575b09@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ravib@amazon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox