From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:15:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:15:33 -0500 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:12042 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:15:21 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: root@chaos.analogic.com cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: linux 2.4.0-test9 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2000 16:31:23 CDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 14:15:14 +1100 Message-ID: <9703.973566914@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:31:23 -0500 (EST), "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: >However when running, the new kernel 2.4.0-test9, can't be used to >make a usable initrd ram disk. The result being that 2.4.0-test9 >can't, itself, build an "initrd" bootable system. > >Before everybody screams that I don't know what I'm doing, let me >assure you that I know that the two kernels put their modules in >different directories and the new directory scheme seems to require >the latest and greatest version of modutils. You also need the latest version of mkinitrd to handle the modules directory structure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/