From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 04:47:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 04:47:23 -0500 Received: from smtp2.free.fr ([212.27.32.6]:5637 "EHLO smtp2.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 04:47:12 -0500 To: "Mike A. Harris" Subject: Re: Bonding... Message-ID: <975575796.3a261af501379@imp.free.fr> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:16:37 +0100 (MET) From: Willy Tarreau Cc: Linux Kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 195.6.58.78 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > When using ethernet bonding, does it divide the load between the > two based on connection, or packet by packet? packet by packet, so you can use both links to aggregate your bandwidth. I've used it at 200 Mbps with success. Regards Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/