From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: Check dma_fence in canonical way
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:45:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9793bfc7-5309-4e19-a0e4-5e298720aa9e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424130254.42046-6-phasta@kernel.org>
On 4/24/25 15:02, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> In nouveau_fence_done(), a fence is checked for being signaled by
> manually evaluating the base fence's bits. This can be done in a
> canonical manner through dma_fence_is_signaled().
>
> Replace the bit-check with dma_fence_is_signaled().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
I think the bit check was used here as fast path optimization because we later call dma_fence_is_signaled() anyway.
Feel free to add my acked-by, but honestly what nouveau does here looks rather suspicious to me.
Regards,
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> index fb9811938c82..d5654e26d5bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
> struct nouveau_channel *chan;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
> + if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&fence->base))
> return true;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-28 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 13:02 [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence.c Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/nouveau: nouveau_fence: Standardize list iterations Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify calls to nvif_event_block() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence_done() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-28 14:43 ` Christian König
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: Check dma_fence in canonical way Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:24 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-24 13:25 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-28 14:45 ` Christian König [this message]
2025-05-08 9:13 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-08 9:54 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 14:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence.c Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9793bfc7-5309-4e19-a0e4-5e298720aa9e@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox