From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Lee <chullee@google.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Introduce linear search for dentries
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:25:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9799a430-c1d9-4f04-9a8c-ad88fade8351@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBjLoBxtMQjKQXdzyt8x75--mT9nJZnoEpDArL56fg8JRPdTg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024/12/20 12:59, Daniel Lee wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 5:29 AM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 2024/12/17 15:55, Daniel Lee wrote:
>>> This patch addresses an issue where some files in case-insensitive
>>> directories become inaccessible due to changes in how the kernel function,
>>> utf8_casefold(), generates case-folded strings from the commit 5c26d2f1d3f5
>>> ("unicode: Don't special case ignorable code points").
>>>
>>> F2FS uses these case-folded names to calculate hash values for locating
>>> dentries and stores them on disk. Since utf8_casefold() can produce
>>> different output across kernel versions, stored hash values and newly
>>> calculated hash values may differ. This results in affected files no
>>> longer being found via the hash-based lookup.
>>>
>>> To resolve this, the patch introduces a linear search fallback.
>>> If the initial hash-based search fails, F2FS will sequentially scan the
>>> directory entries.
>>>
>>
>> Need a fixes line?
>
> Thanks. I will add the commit 5c26d2f1d3f5 to the Fixes:
>
>>
>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219586
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lee <chullee@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/dir.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 ++++--
>>> fs/f2fs/inline.c | 5 +++--
>>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
>>> index 47a5c806cf16..a85d19b4e178 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
>>> @@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ static unsigned long dir_block_index(unsigned int level,
>>> static struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_in_block(struct inode *dir,
>>> struct page *dentry_page,
>>> const struct f2fs_filename *fname,
>>> - int *max_slots)
>>> + int *max_slots,
>>> + bool use_hash)
>>> {
>>> struct f2fs_dentry_block *dentry_blk;
>>> struct f2fs_dentry_ptr d;
>>> @@ -183,7 +184,7 @@ static struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_in_block(struct inode *dir,
>>> dentry_blk = (struct f2fs_dentry_block *)page_address(dentry_page);
>>>
>>> make_dentry_ptr_block(dir, &d, dentry_blk);
>>> - return f2fs_find_target_dentry(&d, fname, max_slots);
>>> + return f2fs_find_target_dentry(&d, fname, max_slots, use_hash);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static inline int f2fs_match_name(const struct inode *dir,
>>> @@ -208,7 +209,8 @@ static inline int f2fs_match_name(const struct inode *dir,
>>> }
>>>
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_target_dentry(const struct f2fs_dentry_ptr *d,
>>> - const struct f2fs_filename *fname, int *max_slots)
>>> + const struct f2fs_filename *fname, int *max_slots,
>>> + bool use_hash)
>>> {
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *de;
>>> unsigned long bit_pos = 0;
>>> @@ -231,7 +233,7 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_target_dentry(const struct f2fs_dentry_ptr *d,
>>> continue;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (de->hash_code == fname->hash) {
>>> + if (!use_hash || de->hash_code == fname->hash) {
>>> res = f2fs_match_name(d->inode, fname,
>>> d->filename[bit_pos],
>>> le16_to_cpu(de->name_len));
>>> @@ -258,11 +260,12 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_target_dentry(const struct f2fs_dentry_ptr *d,
>>> static struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_in_level(struct inode *dir,
>>> unsigned int level,
>>> const struct f2fs_filename *fname,
>>> - struct page **res_page)
>>> + struct page **res_page,
>>> + bool use_hash)
>>> {
>>> int s = GET_DENTRY_SLOTS(fname->disk_name.len);
>>> unsigned int nbucket, nblock;
>>> - unsigned int bidx, end_block;
>>> + unsigned int bidx, end_block, bucket_no;
>>> struct page *dentry_page;
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *de = NULL;
>>> pgoff_t next_pgofs;
>>> @@ -272,8 +275,11 @@ static struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_in_level(struct inode *dir,
>>> nbucket = dir_buckets(level, F2FS_I(dir)->i_dir_level);
>>> nblock = bucket_blocks(level);
>>>
>>> + bucket_no = use_hash ? le32_to_cpu(fname->hash) % nbucket : 0;
>>> +
>>> +start_find_bucket:
>>> bidx = dir_block_index(level, F2FS_I(dir)->i_dir_level,
>>> - le32_to_cpu(fname->hash) % nbucket);
>>> + bucket_no);
>>> end_block = bidx + nblock;
>>>
>>> while (bidx < end_block) {
>>> @@ -290,7 +296,7 @@ static struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_in_level(struct inode *dir,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - de = find_in_block(dir, dentry_page, fname, &max_slots);
>>> + de = find_in_block(dir, dentry_page, fname, &max_slots, use_hash);
>>> if (IS_ERR(de)) {
>>> *res_page = ERR_CAST(de);
>>> de = NULL;
>>> @@ -307,6 +313,9 @@ static struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_in_level(struct inode *dir,
>>> bidx++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (!use_hash && !de && ++bucket_no < nbucket)
>>> + goto start_find_bucket;
>>> +
>>> if (!de && room && F2FS_I(dir)->chash != fname->hash) {
>>
>> Do we need to avoid accessing or assigning hash if use_hash is false?
>>
>
> Is it still worth keeping the hash for the creation if both hash-based
> and linear searches failed?
It needs to be kept for hash-based searching failure? since it was added to
enhance performance of file creation:
- open(..., O_CREAT)
- f2fs_lookup
: didn't find target dirent, then, record last chash & clevel
- f2fs_create
: create dirent in clevel bucket once chash matches
Thanks,
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> F2FS_I(dir)->chash = fname->hash;
>>> F2FS_I(dir)->clevel = level;
>>> @@ -323,11 +332,13 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *__f2fs_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *de = NULL;
>>> unsigned int max_depth;
>>> unsigned int level;
>>> + bool use_hash = true;
>>>
>>> *res_page = NULL;
>>>
>>> +start_find_entry:
>>> if (f2fs_has_inline_dentry(dir)) {
>>> - de = f2fs_find_in_inline_dir(dir, fname, res_page);
>>> + de = f2fs_find_in_inline_dir(dir, fname, res_page, use_hash);
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -343,11 +354,18 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *__f2fs_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
>>> }
>>>
>>> for (level = 0; level < max_depth; level++) {
>>> - de = find_in_level(dir, level, fname, res_page);
>>> + de = find_in_level(dir, level, fname, res_page, use_hash);
>>> if (de || IS_ERR(*res_page))
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> out:
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>> + if (IS_CASEFOLDED(dir) && !de && use_hash) {
>>> + use_hash = false;
>>> + goto start_find_entry;
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>> /* This is to increase the speed of f2fs_create */
>>> if (!de)
>>> F2FS_I(dir)->task = current;
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index f523dd302bf6..1afebb9c4061 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -3588,7 +3588,8 @@ int f2fs_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>> struct f2fs_filename *fname);
>>> void f2fs_free_filename(struct f2fs_filename *fname);
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_target_dentry(const struct f2fs_dentry_ptr *d,
>>> - const struct f2fs_filename *fname, int *max_slots);
>>> + const struct f2fs_filename *fname, int *max_slots,
>>> + bool use_hash);
>>> int f2fs_fill_dentries(struct dir_context *ctx, struct f2fs_dentry_ptr *d,
>>> unsigned int start_pos, struct fscrypt_str *fstr);
>>> void f2fs_do_make_empty_dir(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent,
>>> @@ -4224,7 +4225,8 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio);
>>> int f2fs_recover_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *npage);
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_in_inline_dir(struct inode *dir,
>>> const struct f2fs_filename *fname,
>>> - struct page **res_page);
>>> + struct page **res_page,
>>> + bool use_hash);
>>> int f2fs_make_empty_inline_dir(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent,
>>> struct page *ipage);
>>> int f2fs_add_inline_entry(struct inode *dir, const struct f2fs_filename *fname,
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
>>> index cbd2a0d34804..3e3c35d4c98b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
>>> @@ -352,7 +352,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *npage)
>>>
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_in_inline_dir(struct inode *dir,
>>> const struct f2fs_filename *fname,
>>> - struct page **res_page)
>>> + struct page **res_page,
>>> + bool use_hash)
>>> {
>>> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(dir->i_sb);
>>> struct f2fs_dir_entry *de;
>>> @@ -369,7 +370,7 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_in_inline_dir(struct inode *dir,
>>> inline_dentry = inline_data_addr(dir, ipage);
>>>
>>> make_dentry_ptr_inline(dir, &d, inline_dentry);
>>> - de = f2fs_find_target_dentry(&d, fname, NULL);
>>> + de = f2fs_find_target_dentry(&d, fname, NULL, use_hash);
>>> unlock_page(ipage);
>>> if (IS_ERR(de)) {
>>> *res_page = ERR_CAST(de);
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 7:55 [PATCH] f2fs: Introduce linear search for dentries Daniel Lee
2024-12-19 13:29 ` Chao Yu
2024-12-20 4:59 ` Daniel Lee
2024-12-20 13:25 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2024-12-20 17:04 ` Daniel Lee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-17 7:47 Daniel Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9799a430-c1d9-4f04-9a8c-ad88fade8351@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=chullee@google.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox