public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thomas lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:05:42 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98086274.371452.1501531542630.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7266e60-3bcc-946d-4325-dfd1126c9fc4@amd.com>


> > There can be different cases where an L0->L2 shadow nested page table is
> > marked read only, in particular when a page is read only in L1's nested
> > page tables.  If such a page is accessed by L2 while walking page tables
> > it will cause a nested page fault (page table walks are write accesses).
> >   However, after kvm_mmu_unprotect_page you will get another page fault,
> > and again in an endless stream.
> > 
> > Instead, emulation would have caused a nested page fault vmexit, I think.
> 
> If possible could you please give me some pointer on how to create this use
> case so that we can get definitive answer.
> 
> Looking at the code path is giving me indication that the new code
> (the kvm_mmu_unprotect_page call) only happens if vcpu->arch.mmu_page_fault()
> returns an indication that the instruction should be emulated. I would not
> expect that to be the case scenario you described above since L1 making a page
> read-only (this is a page table for L2) is an error and should result in #NPF
> being injected into L1.

The flow is:

  hardware walks page table; L2 page table points to read only memory
  -> pf_interception (code = 
  -> kvm_handle_page_fault (need_unprotect = false)
  -> kvm_mmu_page_fault
  -> paging64_page_fault (for example)
     -> try_async_pf
        map_writable set to false
     -> paging64_fetch(write_fault = true, map_writable = false, prefault = false)
        -> mmu_set_spte(speculative = false, host_writable = false, write_fault = true)
           -> set_spte
              mmu_need_write_protect returns true
              return true
           write_fault == true -> set emulate = true
           return true
        return true
     return true
  emulate

Without this patch, emulation would have called

  ..._gva_to_gpa_nested
  -> translate_nested_gpa
  -> paging64_gva_to_gpa
  -> paging64_walk_addr
  -> paging64_walk_addr_generic
     set fault (nested_page_fault=true)

and then:

   kvm_propagate_fault
   -> nested_svm_inject_npf_exit

> It's bit hard for me to visualize the code flow and
> figure out exactly how that would happen, but I just tried booting nested
> virtualization and it seem to be working okay.

I don't expect the above to happen when booting a normal guest (usual L1
guests hardly have readonly mappings).

> Is there a kvm-unit-test which I can run to trigger this scenario ? thanks

No, there isn't.

Paolo

> -Brijesh
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-31 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-23 17:01 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: SVM: add additional SVM NPF error and use HW GPA Brijesh Singh
2016-11-23 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 16:27   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-31 13:30     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-31 15:44       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-31 16:54         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-31 20:05           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-08-01 13:36             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-02 10:42               ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-04  0:30                 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-04 14:05                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-04 14:23                     ` Brijesh Singh
2016-11-23 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] kvm: svm: Add kvm_fast_pio_in support Brijesh Singh
2016-11-23 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] kvm: svm: Use the hardware provided GPA instead of page walk Brijesh Singh
2016-11-23 21:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-08 14:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-08 15:39     ` Brijesh Singh
2016-12-08 19:00       ` Brijesh Singh
2016-12-09 15:41         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-12 17:51           ` Brijesh Singh
2016-12-13 17:09             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-14 17:07               ` Brijesh Singh
2016-12-14 17:23                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-14 18:39                   ` Brijesh Singh
2016-12-14 18:47                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-24 20:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: SVM: add additional SVM NPF error and use HW GPA Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98086274.371452.1501531542630.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox