From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:13:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:13:30 -0400 Received: from dns.ipv6.univ-nantes.fr ([193.52.101.20]:51472 "HELO popeye.ipv6.univ-nantes.fr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:13:22 -0400 Subject: Oracle 8I & Kernel 2.4.3 : Sane ? From: Yann Dupont To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10+cvs.2001.04.01.08.00 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Apr 2001 14:12:40 +0200 Message-Id: <986213560.24497.2.camel@olive> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Some times ago, I tried Kernel 2.4.2 with oracle 8i (old version, 8.1.5) Oracle was working fine at start, but after some hours we encountered problems (I'm not database guru, I'm not able to say what was really not working, it seems like a "rollback segment" was unable to be modified / stuck) I noticed that 2.4.3 contains some fixs for shared memory - So the final question IS : Is oracle 8.1.5 + Kernel 2.4.3 a sane combination ? In general is oracle + Kernel 2.4 working ? (BTW, if that matter this is on a 4-xeon Proc + 3GB ram) Yann Dupont. -- \|/ ____ \|/ Fac. des sciences de Nantes-Linux-Python-IPv6-ATM-BONOM.... "@'/ ,. \@" Tel :(+33) [0]251125865(AM)[0]251125857(PM)[0]251125868(Fax) /_| \__/ |_\ Yann.Dupont@sciences.univ-nantes.fr \__U_/ http://www.unantes.univ-nantes.fr/~dupont