From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:38:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:38:45 -0400 Received: from dns.ipv6.univ-nantes.fr ([193.52.101.20]:57873 "HELO popeye.ipv6.univ-nantes.fr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:38:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Oracle 8I & Kernel 2.4.3 : Sane ? From: Yann Dupont To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10+cvs.2001.04.01.08.00 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Apr 2001 09:37:44 +0200 Message-Id: <986283464.10243.0.camel@olive> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 02 Apr 2001 23:04:50 +0100, Alan Cox a écrit : > > I noticed that 2.4.3 contains some fixs for shared memory - > > So the final question IS : > > > > Is oracle 8.1.5 + Kernel 2.4.3 a sane combination ? > > Probably not yet but getting closer. Ok, thanks for the quick answer. That's good news. > > > In general is oracle + Kernel 2.4 working ? > > Ditto. > > The shm and rawio fixes are very recent > Ok. That needs some test ... Yann Dupont. -- \|/ ____ \|/ Fac. des sciences de Nantes-Linux-Python-IPv6-ATM-BONOM.... "@'/ ,. \@" Tel :(+33) [0]251125865(AM)[0]251125857(PM)[0]251125868(Fax) /_| \__/ |_\ Yann.Dupont@sciences.univ-nantes.fr \__U_/ http://www.unantes.univ-nantes.fr/~dupont