From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968312AbcA1EOO (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:14:14 -0500 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:47351 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966712AbcA1EOH (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:14:07 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfee691-f79766d0000012b6-5e-56a9958c98e6 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 04:14:04 +0000 (GMT) From: MyungJoo Ham Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: tegra: Set freq in rate callback To: Tyler Baker , Thierry Reding Cc: Tomeu Vizoso , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , =?utf-8?Q?=EB=B0=95=EA=B2=BD=EB=AF=BC?= , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" Reply-to: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com MIME-version: 1.0 X-MTR: 20160128040744886@myungjoo.ham Msgkey: 20160128040744886@myungjoo.ham X-EPLocale: ko_KR.utf-8 X-Priority: 3 X-EPWebmail-Msg-Type: personal X-EPWebmail-Reply-Demand: 0 X-EPApproval-Locale: X-EPHeader: ML X-MLAttribute: X-RootMTR: 20160128040744886@myungjoo.ham X-ParentMTR: X-ArchiveUser: X-CPGSPASS: N X-ConfirmMail: N,general Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-version: 1.0 Message-id: <987619535.304031453954442569.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas09c> X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRsSkQLdn6sowg1k3eS0u75rD5sDo8XmT XABjFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldG67F/7AUXuCrOntdvYFzB1cXIySEkoC6xaMlJNhBbQsBEYs7M OcwQtpjEhXvrgeJcQDVLGSWmTfjIDlPUsW8JO0RiDqPEuqatYN0sAqoSU480MXYxcnCwCehJ zPycDBIWFnCX+HB/HdhQEYFIibMrvrCA9DILtDNL3Gt5wA5xhZLEmn2vWEBsXgFBiZMzn7CA zJEAmnnkiiZEWE1i5varjBA3iEtcmHsJ6h5eiRntT1kgbDmJaV/XQD0gLXF+1gZGmGcWf38M FeeXOHZ7BxOELSAx9cxBqBotifsTnkHZfBJrFr5lganfdWo5M8yu+1vmQvVKSGxtecIKYjML KEpM6X7IDnIys4CmxPpd+qg+AbHdJX7e/wIONgmBqRwSvw8fYZ/AqDQLSd0sJKNmIYxCVrKA kWUVo2hqQXJBcVJ6kalecWJucWleul5yfu4mRmBSOP3v2cQdjPcPWB9iFOBgVOLhXRG+MkyI NbGsuDL3EKMpMJImMkuJJucDU09eSbyhsZmRhamJqbGRuaWZkjivjvTPYCGB9MSS1OzU1ILU ovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2M59QzHmms1lMV+XbLRCr56jW7jIeux7OY/8v/Oyc/91x4/K9SlqzV yVoabonLjFwNGEs3/dvqteh294UOfX6p5LSO6f/r1VT4IsJ6jxc9//iiwS9/qkny5WzbZ41J Dlc199wN5o18pzr/W6nfXwmp7VF/H67lE57SLbaJf79C6zXevXc9nkYrsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIA 9m3D/QUDAAA= X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrMKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/tPt2eqSvDDBrfc1pc3jWHzYHR4/Mm uQDGqDSbjNTElNQihdS85PyUzLx0WyXv4HjneFMzA0NdQ0sLcyWFvMTcVFslF58AXbfMHKCh SgpliTmlQKGAxOJiJX07m6L80pJUhYz84hJbpWhDcyM9IwM9UyM9Q+NYK0MDAyNToJqEtIzW Y//YCy5wVZw9r9/AuIKri5GTQ0hAXWLRkpNsILaEgIlEx74l7BC2mMSFe+uB4lxANXMYJdY1 bQUrYhFQlZh6pImxi5GDg01AT2Lm52SQsLCAu8SH++uYQWwRgUiJsyu+sID0Mgu0M0vca3nA DrFMSWLNvlcsIDavgKDEyZlPWEDmSADNPHJFEyKsJjFz+1VGiBvEJS7MvQR1D6/EjPanLBC2 nMS0r2uYIWxpifOzNjDC3Lz4+2OoOL/Esds7mCBsAYmpZw5C1WhJ3J/wDMrmk1iz8C0LTP2u U8uZYXbd3zIXqldCYmvLE1YQm1lAUWJK90N2kJOZBTQl1u/SR/UJiO0u8fP+F/YJjLKzkKRm IemehdCNrGQBI8sqRtHUguSC4qT0ChO94sTc4tK8dL3k/NxNjOAE9GzJDsaGC9aHGAU4GJV4 eBmiVoYJsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuFVrAYK8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYjQFRtlEZinR5Hxgcswr iTc0NjYxMzG1NLEwMDVXEue9vc8vTEggPbEkNTs1tSC1CKaPiYNTqoFxe8CFd1UF/YK7NPYG 65++pjfzgtON16kHGW4JtK7t1pQpD4xOF7pU3D5728HTxTvnTOWaZLr6uNBnvm+/DAKPuvPr rfK01K4LnxUpPct25+0+0Xu/tWzV129jXGR9ZkdI0ZXUj1uOrpWun71Y497O9zYyzF7Pe1Y1 2Z9V/8cpfWLm9XMfdzn9VWIpzkg01GIuKk4EAE7Ab3pWAwAA DLP-Filter: Pass X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id u0S4F6Lj018192 > Hi Thierry, > > On 21 January 2016 at 02:54, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: [] > >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso > >> Reported-by: Tyler Baker [] > >> > > > > I had noticed it recently but hadn't got around to look into it, thanks > > for fixing it. > > > > Tested-by: Thierry Reding > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding > > I don't see this patch in -next yet, so I'm guess it hasn't been > applied. Any chance you could pick it up? This issue is now > manifesting in mainline, and causing ton of noise in the boot reports. > > Cheers, > > Tyler Hey, the patch appeared at the mailing list a week ago. Linux 4.5-rc1 appeared 3 days ago. The fastest possible for mainline inclusion is 4.5-rc2 or 3. You cannot simply expect the patch to be included in the maiinline that fast.