From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 May 2001 14:32:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 May 2001 14:32:38 -0400 Received: from [24.93.67.54] ([24.93.67.54]:11279 "EHLO mail7.nc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 May 2001 14:32:21 -0400 Subject: Re: Could clock granularity be increased???? From: Sam Coles To: shreenivasa H V Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010505175314.7785.qmail@nwcst288.netaddress.usa.net> In-Reply-To: <20010505175314.7785.qmail@nwcst288.netaddress.usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release) Date: 05 May 2001 14:34:14 -0400 Message-Id: <989087664.885.0.camel@sam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Will editing include/asm/param.h not do the trick? Sam On 05 May 2001 12:53:14 -0500, shreenivasa H V wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way I could use a clock granularity of less than 10ms if I need > to do some hacking of the kernel TCP code? Ideally I would require the > interval of the order of 10-100 microseconds. > thanks, > shreeni. > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/