public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 18/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 07:19:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98c448be-8ea8-a0bd-62cc-3bc3a5cf5569@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704093242.583575-19-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On 23. 7. 4. 18:32, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The currently supported RK3399 has a set of registers per channel, but
> it has only a single DDRMON_CTRL register. With upcoming RK3588 this
> will be different, the RK3588 has a DDRMON_CTRL register per channel.
> 
> Instead of expecting a single DDRMON_CTRL register, loop over the
> channels and write the channel specific DDRMON_CTRL register. Break
> out early out of the loop when there is only a single DDRMON_CTRL
> register like on the RK3399.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 85ec93fd41858..2362d3953ba40 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -113,12 +113,13 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
>  	int burst_len;
>  	int buswidth[DMC_MAX_CHANNELS];
>  	int ddrmon_stride;
> +	bool ddrmon_ctrl_single;
>  };
>  
>  static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
>  
> @@ -132,29 +133,41 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* clear DDRMON_CTRL setting */
> -	writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN |
> -		       DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN), dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +	for (i = 0; i < DMC_MAX_CHANNELS; i++) {
> +		u32 ctrl = 0;
>  
> -	/* set ddr type to dfi */
> -	switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> -	case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> -	case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> -		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> -			       dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> -		break;
> -	case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> -	case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> -		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> -			       dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		break;
> -	}
> +		if (!(dfi->channel_mask & BIT(i)))
> +			continue;
>  
> -	/* enable count, use software mode */
> -	writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN, DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN),
> -		       dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +		/* clear DDRMON_CTRL setting */
> +		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN |
> +			       DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN),
> +			       dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +
> +		/* set ddr type to dfi */
> +		switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> +		case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> +		case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> +			ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> +			break;
> +		case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> +		case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> +			ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> +			       dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +
> +		/* enable count, use software mode */
> +		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN, DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN),
> +			       dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +
> +		if (dfi->ddrmon_ctrl_single)
> +			break;
> +	}
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&dfi->mutex);
>  
> @@ -164,6 +177,7 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>  static void rockchip_dfi_disable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
>  
> @@ -174,8 +188,17 @@ static void rockchip_dfi_disable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>  	if (dfi->usecount > 0)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN),
> -		       dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +	for (i = 0; i < DMC_MAX_CHANNELS; i++) {
> +		if (!(dfi->channel_mask & BIT(i)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN),
> +			      dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
> +
> +		if (dfi->ddrmon_ctrl_single)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(dfi->clk);
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&dfi->mutex);
> @@ -666,6 +689,7 @@ static int rk3399_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>  	dfi->buswidth[1] = FIELD_GET(RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH1, val) == 0 ? 4 : 2;
>  
>  	dfi->ddrmon_stride = 0x14;
> +	dfi->ddrmon_ctrl_single = true;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  };

Even if rk3568 has the only one channle and don't need to check whether 'dfi->ddrmon_ctrl_single'
is true or not because of 'if (!(dfi->channel_mask & BIT(i)))',
I recommand the add 'dfi->ddrmon_ctrl_single = true;' for rk3568 in order to
provide the number of DDRMON_CTRL reigster of rk3568.

If rk3568 doesn't have the 'ddrmon_ctrl_single', actually it is not easy
to catch what why are there no initilization for rk3568. 
 
-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-08 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-04  9:32 [PATCH v7 00/26] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Make pmu regmap mandatory Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:03   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Embed desc into private data struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:04   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for " Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:06   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 04/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:22   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: dfi store raw values in counter struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:34   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Use free running counter Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: introduce channel mask Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:22     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-16 12:45       ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:28         ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc,dfi: generalize DDRTYPE defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:43   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 13:10     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 19:11   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:03     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:34       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:17   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:34     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:31       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR2 correctly Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 12/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR4X Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:26   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Pass private data struct to internal functions Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:28   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Prepare for multiple users Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:46   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: give variable a better name Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:37   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add perf support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:48   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:16     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: make register stride SoC specific Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:57   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:19   ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2023-10-16 12:49     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588 Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:22   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml Sascha Hauer
2023-10-09  0:40   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3588 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,rk3588-pmugrf Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: Enable DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s: " Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98c448be-8ea8-a0bd-62cc-3bc3a5cf5569@kernel.org \
    --to=chanwoo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox