The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com,
	Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/15] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:47:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98d80660-7140-43a2-b17c-07a0884996f8@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250908-wip-mca-updates-v6-2-eef5d6c74b9c@amd.com>



On 9/8/25 18:40, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> Currently, MCA initialization is executed identically on each CPU as
> they are brought online. However, a number of MCA initialization tasks
> only need to be done once.
> 
> Define a function to collect all 'global' init tasks and call this from
> the BSP only. Start with CPU features.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>

<snip>

> @@ -2240,6 +2233,27 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW(exc_machine_check)
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> +void mca_bsp_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> +{
> +	u64 cap;
> +
> +	if (!mce_available(c))
> +		return;
> +
> +	mce_flags.overflow_recov = cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OVERFLOW_RECOV);
> +	mce_flags.succor	 = cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SUCCOR);
> +	mce_flags.smca		 = cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SMCA);
> +
> +	rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP, cap);
> +
> +	/* Use accurate RIP reporting if available. */
> +	if ((cap & MCG_EXT_P) && MCG_EXT_CNT(cap) >= 9)
> +		mca_cfg.rip_msr = MSR_IA32_MCG_EIP;
> +
> +	if (cap & MCG_SER_P)
> +		mca_cfg.ser = 1;
> +}
> +


LGTM

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>

nit: One question though for those CPUs which consist of P+E cores, is 
it mandated that both types of cores will have identical MCE 
architecture, I assume the x86 world will be a lot more unified than 
Arm's big.LITTLE ?

>   /*
>    * Called for each booted CPU to set up machine checks.
>    * Must be called with preempt off:
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-08 15:40 [PATCH v6 00/15] AMD MCA interrupts rework Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] x86/mce: Set CR4.MCE last during init Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 11:43   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 11:47   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2025-09-10 13:53     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 14:28       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-10 17:23     ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 11:48   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] x86/mce: Do 'UNKNOWN' vendor check early Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 13:27   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] x86/mce: Separate global and per-CPU quirks Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 13:29   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 06/15] x86/mce: Move machine_check_poll() status checks to helper functions Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 15:09   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] x86/mce: Add clear_bank() helper Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 15:22   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] x86/mce: Unify AMD THR handler with MCA Polling Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR " Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] x86/mce/amd: Enable interrupt vectors once per-CPU on SMCA systems Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-11 10:22   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-11 15:53     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] x86/mce/amd: Support SMCA Corrected Error Interrupt Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] x86/mce/amd: Remove redundant reset_block() Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-11 14:42   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-11 16:11     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] x86/mce/amd: Define threshold restart function for banks Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-11 14:49   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 15:40 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] x86/mce: Save and use APEI corrected threshold limit Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-11 17:01   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-15 17:33     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-19 10:42       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-22 13:58         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-08 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] AMD MCA interrupts rework Luck, Tony
2025-09-09 13:36   ` Yazen Ghannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98d80660-7140-43a2-b17c-07a0884996f8@suse.com \
    --to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox