The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@tanstaafl.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: poll() behaves differently in Linux 2.4.1 vs. Linux 2.2.14 (POLLHUP)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:12:06 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98n94m$5pt$1@forge.intermeta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010314015921.19287.qmail@web11808.mail.yahoo.com>, <15022.53815.129522.746120@pizda.ninka.net>

davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller) writes:

>Jeffrey Butler writes:
> >   I've noticed that poll() calls on IPv4 sockets do
> > not behave the same under linux 2.4 vs. linux 2.2.14. 
> > Linux 2.4 will return POLLHUP for a socket that is not
> > connected (and has never been connected) while Linux
> > 2.2 will not.
> >   The following example program demonstrates the
> > problem when it's run under linux 2.4:

>True, this behavior was changed from 2.2.x.  We now match the behavior
>of other svr4 systems, in particular Solaris.  This new behavior in
>2.4.x will not change.

Hi,

but Jeffrey wrote:

--- cut ---
JB> Other operating systems (not that they are necessarily
JB> correct) also output the same as Linux 2.2.14.  I
JB> tried this on FreeBSD 4.4.1, Solaris 5.7 (on a SPARC),
JB> and Windows 2000 with Cygwin 1.1.7.
--- cut ---

This is BSD, SysVR4 and an abomination all behaving like 2.2.x and not
2.4.x (which confuses the heck out of a poll()-using daemon
here... :-) )

I'd prefer not to have too many user space surprises in moving from
2.2 to 2.4.

	Regards
		Henning
-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen       -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH     hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22  Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0   info@intermeta.de
D-91054 Buckenhof     Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20   

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-14  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-14  1:59 poll() behaves differently in Linux 2.4.1 vs. Linux 2.2.14 (POLLHUP) Jeffrey Butler
2001-03-14  2:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-14  8:12   ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen [this message]
2001-03-14 16:28   ` Jeffrey Butler
2001-03-14 19:50   ` kuznet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-15  4:00 Jeffrey Butler
2001-03-15 17:22 ` kuznet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='98n94m$5pt$1@forge.intermeta.de' \
    --to=hps@tanstaafl.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox