From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264461AbRFTBAI>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:00:08 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264465AbRFTA77>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:59:59 -0400
Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.177]:60221 "EHLO
	johnson.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264461AbRFTA7m>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:59:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)
From: Robert Love <rml@ufl.edu>
To: Chris Ricker <kaboom@gatech.edu>
Cc: David "S." Miller <davem@redhat.com>,
        Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@pobox.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191801240.7174-100000@verdande.oobleck.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191801240.7174-100000@verdande.oobleck.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release)
Date: 19 Jun 2001 20:59:43 -0400
Message-Id: <992998787.730.0.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 19 Jun 2001 18:04:21 -0600, Chris Ricker wrote:
> It's a very impressive difference:
><snip>
> Process fork+exit: 563.7778 microseconds
><snip>
> Process fork+exit: 4249.5000 microseconds

_WOW_ -- i think you just ended that discussion... wow.

Robert M. Love
rml@ufl.edu
rml@tech9.net