From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:58:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:57:57 -0400 Received: from 513.holly-springs.nc.us ([216.27.31.173]:51213 "EHLO 513.holly-springs.nc.us") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:57:45 -0400 Subject: Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) From: Michael Rothwell To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release) Date: 19 Jun 2001 22:57:38 -0400 Message-Id: <993005859.1799.1.camel@gromit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19 Jun 2001 20:01:56 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Linux inherits several unix properties which are not friendly to good state > based programming - lack of good AIO for one. Oh, how I would love for select() and poll() to work on files... or for any other working AIO mothods to be present. What would get broken if things were changed to let select() work for filesystem fds?