public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen, input: try to read screen resolution for xen-kbdfront
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:31:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99484bfc-a64f-094c-bb09-3b265bcad40b@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ec171a9-c38a-87e6-d1f6-5493211dc87e@gmail.com>

On 27/01/17 09:26, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 01/27/2017 10:14 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 27/01/17 08:53, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 01/27/2017 09:46 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/17 08:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>>> On 01/27/2017 09:12 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>>> Instead of using the default resolution of 800*600 for the pointing
>>>>>> device of xen-kbdfront try to read the resolution of the (virtual)
>>>>>> framebuffer device. Use the default as fallback only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> V2: get framebuffer resolution only if CONFIG_FB (Dmitry Torokhov)
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>>>>>> index 3900875..3aae9b4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>>>>>     #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/errno.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/module.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/fb.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/input.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>>>     @@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ static irqreturn_t input_handler(int rq, void
>>>>>> *dev_id)
>>>>>>     static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>>>>>>                       const struct xenbus_device_id *id)
>>>>>>     {
>>>>>> -    int ret, i;
>>>>>> +    int ret, i, width, height;
>>>>>>         unsigned int abs;
>>>>>>         struct xenkbd_info *info;
>>>>>>         struct input_dev *kbd, *ptr;
>>>>>> @@ -173,9 +174,17 @@ static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device
>>>>>> *dev,
>>>>>>         ptr->id.product = 0xfffe;
>>>>>>           if (abs) {
>>>>>> +        width = XENFB_WIDTH;
>>>>>> +        height = XENFB_HEIGHT;
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FB
>>>>>> +        if (registered_fb[0]) {
>>>>> This still will not help if FB gets registered after kbd+ptr
>>>> Hmm, so you think I should add a call to fb_register_client() to get
>>>> events for new registered framebuffer devices?
>>> yes, but also pay attention to CONFIG_FB_NOTIFY: you may still
>>> end up w/o notification.
>> Okay, that's not worse than today.
> agree
>>>> This would probably work. I'll have a try.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>> My bigger concern here is that we try to tie keyboard and pointer device
>>> to the framebuffer. IMO, these are independent parts of the system and
>>> the relation
>>> depends on the use-case. One can have graphics enabled w/o framebuffer
>>> at all, e.g.
>>> DRM/KMS + OpenGLES + Weston + kbd + ptr...
>> Again: that's a use case which will work as today. The current defaults
>> are being used.
>>
>> The question is whether we should add a module parameter switching off
>> the automatic adaption of the resolution as there might be use cases
>> where we don't want this feature.
> I think for those who doesn't want this resolution there is
> still a possibility to change it on backend's XenbusStateConnected
> So, no need for module parameter, IMO

Fine.

I'll send V3 soon.


Juergen

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-27  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-27  7:12 [PATCH v2] xen,input: try to read screen resolution for xen-kbdfront Juergen Gross
2017-01-27  7:21 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen, input: " Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2017-01-27  7:46   ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-27  7:53     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2017-01-27  8:14       ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-27  8:26         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2017-01-27  8:31           ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2017-01-27 16:10             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-30 11:23               ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-30 11:27                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2017-02-17 19:47                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-20  6:05                     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99484bfc-a64f-094c-bb09-3b265bcad40b@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=andr2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox