From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet)
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Wu, Bryan" <Bryan.Wu@analog.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char dev BKL pushdown
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:25:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9968.1211325938@vena.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 2008 19:01:24 EDT." <8bd0f97a0805201601h1b08df6fw3fbf6c58759b07b4@mail.gmail.com>
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> please drop the coreb.c changes from your patch
At a minimum, I would hope such a request would say something like "I've
looked at the driver's locking and am convinced that the BKL is not
needed." Have you done that? There is a certain leap of faith involved
in removing that protection from a driver.
I decided to take a quick look...
- You use spin_lock_irq(&coreb_lock) in a number of places, but you do
not take the lock in the interrupt handler. You also do not take the
lock in coreb_write() or coreb_read(), so those can race with the
interrupt handler, with ioctl(), and with each other.
- coreb_write() and coreb_read() do interruptible waits, but do not
check to see whether they were interrupted. They will, in fact,
continue in their I/O loops after a signal.
- In both functions you have:
unsigned long p = *ppos;
if (p + count > coreb_size)
return -EFAULT;
that calculation can overflow.
- You also do this:
static ssize_t coreb_write(struct file *file, const char *buf, size_t count,
loff_t * ppos)
/* ... */
set_dma_start_addr(CH_MEM_STREAM2_SRC, (unsigned long)buf);
In other words, the DMA is done directly to/from a user-space
address. Maybe that's safe on Blackfin, I don't know...
- I have no idea why some of your functions are using d_inode->i_mutex.
- In coreb_ioctl():
spin_lock_irq(&coreb_lock);
if (coreb_status & COREB_IS_RUNNING) {
retval = -EBUSY;
break;
}
this will exit the function with the spinlock still held and
interrupts disabled.
case CMD_COREB_RESET:
printk(KERN_INFO "Resetting Core B\n");
bfin_write_SICB_SYSCR(bfin_read_SICB_SYSCR() | 0x0080);
break;
You do not acquire the lock here, so this can race against other
ioctl() calls. And ioctl() can race against read() and write().
Registration and such seem reasonable, so I can't come up with a
scenario where loss of BKL protection will create trouble. Given the
other problems there, though, I'll confess to being a bit nervous about
it.
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-14 17:49 [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 21:00 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 21:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-14 21:17 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:19 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 13:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-15 14:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 10:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 20:05 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2008-05-14 21:45 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 21:39 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-22 20:20 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 15:44 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-16 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-16 16:03 ` [PATCH] kill empty chardev open/release methods Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-16 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-18 19:46 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-18 19:58 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 16:22 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Alan Cox
2008-05-16 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-16 16:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-17 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-18 20:26 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-19 23:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <200805200111.47275.arnd@arndb.de>
2008-05-19 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog " Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-20 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 15:47 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-05-20 18:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 21:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-22 9:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 9:08 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 8:42 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-19 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char " Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 0:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 0:21 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-20 0:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 8:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 23:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 23:25 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2008-05-21 16:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-19 23:34 ` [PATCH 3/3, RFC] remove BKL from misc_open() Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 15:13 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-20 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 18:51 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-17 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-18 20:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 22:11 ` [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-15 15:05 ` John Stoffel
2008-05-15 15:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 15:18 ` John Stoffel
2008-05-15 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 8:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-15 14:54 ` Diego Calleja
2008-05-14 21:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-15 20:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-15 20:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 21:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-17 0:14 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-05-17 0:37 ` Kevin Winchester
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9968.1211325938@vena.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=Bryan.Wu@analog.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox