From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:37:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:37:42 -0400 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:24840 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:37:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.7-ac11: Updated emu10k1 driver From: Robert Love To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release) Date: 10 Aug 2001 19:38:28 -0400 Message-Id: <997486712.688.37.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 Aug 2001 00:31:11 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > The "maintainer" is listed as Creative. They have not updated anything > > in a year (in the kernel tree; their CVS tree gets frequent updates). > > I've kind of assumed Rui was maintainer for a long time now. Creative seem > to have basically ditched it and run I didn't know this. The MAINTAINERS file lists Creative and gives what looks like a generic email address, although I know not to trust that file. Perhaps it should be updated. I would not mind being a liason between the Creative Open Source development and the official kernel -- creating and forwarding patches and so forth, but I am not really involved in the drivers development. I just want to keep a driver I use up to date. -- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net