From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755548AbZJFHUE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:20:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754161AbZJFHUD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:20:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58706 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754157AbZJFHUC (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:20:02 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <4ACAEB6D.2020601@redhat.com> References: <4ACAEB6D.2020601@redhat.com> <20091005063919.3958.65581.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <22214.1254748402@redhat.com> To: Amerigo Wang Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brian Behlendorf , Ben Woodard , Stable Team , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Patch v2] rwsem: fix rwsem_is_locked() bugs Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:18:09 +0100 Message-ID: <9987.1254813489@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Amerigo Wang wrote: > Since if we have locks, we don't need memory barriers any more, right? Indeed - locks are implicit memory barriers. David