From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nigel@nrg.org
Subject: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Date: 26 Aug 2001 21:57:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy> (raw)
Available at:
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-preempt-kernel-1
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.8-ac12-preempt-kernel-1
for kernel 2.4.9 and 2.4.8-ac12, respectively.
This is a straight update of Nigel Gamble's Linux kernel preemption
patch from http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net, updated for the above
kernels. Thus, this is Nigel's code -- I merely updated it.
I am eager to see work done on the patch and to see what its future may
be. If you are in any way interested in application latency or
real-time support, I suggest you check this out. If you are just
curious, its an interesting patch none-the-less.
Some benchmarks:
kernel 2.4.8-ac12 (nonpreempt):
dbench 16:
Throughput 12.9453 MB/sec (NB=16.1816 MB/sec 129.453 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 76.0099 MB/sec (NB=95.0123 MB/sec 760.099 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:35.51 (386.34s user, 23.41s system)
kernel 2.4.8-ac12 with preemptible kernel patch:
dbench 16:
Throughput 13.3579 MB/sec (NB=16.6974 MB/sec 133.579 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 31.4971 MB/sec (NB=39.3714 MB/sec 314.971 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:23.26 (387.10s user, 23.42s system)
The performance increase in kernel compile and dbench 16 is decent, but
the decrease in dbench 1 is odd. I am curious what numbers others find.
My "how does it feel" benchmark is that bandwidth seems similar while
multitasking may be a tad smoother with the patch.
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next reply other threads:[~2001-08-27 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-27 1:57 Robert Love [this message]
2001-08-27 3:06 ` Updated Linux kernel preemption patches Daniel Phillips
2001-08-27 3:09 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 7:38 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 13:46 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 15:20 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 19:31 ` J Sloan
2001-08-27 19:44 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:12 ` Andrey Nekrasov
2001-08-27 21:35 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:18 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:24 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 21:40 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 23:06 ` Andrey Nekrasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigel@nrg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox