public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nigel@nrg.org
Subject: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Date: 26 Aug 2001 21:57:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy> (raw)

Available at:

http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-preempt-kernel-1
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.8-ac12-preempt-kernel-1

for kernel 2.4.9 and 2.4.8-ac12, respectively.

This is a straight update of Nigel Gamble's Linux kernel preemption
patch from http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net, updated for the above
kernels.  Thus, this is Nigel's code -- I merely updated it.

I am eager to see work done on the patch and to see what its future may
be.  If you are in any way interested in application latency or
real-time support, I suggest you check this out.  If you are just
curious, its an interesting patch none-the-less.

Some benchmarks:

kernel 2.4.8-ac12 (nonpreempt):
dbench 16:
Throughput 12.9453 MB/sec (NB=16.1816 MB/sec  129.453 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 76.0099 MB/sec (NB=95.0123 MB/sec  760.099 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:35.51 (386.34s user, 23.41s system)

kernel 2.4.8-ac12 with preemptible kernel patch:
dbench 16:
Throughput 13.3579 MB/sec (NB=16.6974 MB/sec  133.579 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 31.4971 MB/sec (NB=39.3714 MB/sec  314.971 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:23.26 (387.10s user, 23.42s system)

The performance increase in kernel compile and dbench 16 is decent, but
the decrease in dbench 1 is odd.  I am curious what numbers others find.
My "how does it feel" benchmark is that bandwidth seems similar while
multitasking may be a tad smoother with the patch.

-- 
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net


             reply	other threads:[~2001-08-27  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-27  1:57 Robert Love [this message]
2001-08-27  3:06 ` Updated Linux kernel preemption patches Daniel Phillips
2001-08-27  3:09   ` Robert Love
2001-08-27  7:38 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 13:46   ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 15:20     ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 19:31   ` J Sloan
2001-08-27 19:44     ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:12       ` Andrey Nekrasov
2001-08-27 21:35         ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:18       ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:24         ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 21:40           ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 23:06             ` Andrey Nekrasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox