From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:24:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:24:50 -0400 Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.177]:57352 "EHLO johnson.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:24:38 -0400 Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9 From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: lkml , "ext3-users@redhat.com" In-Reply-To: <3B991346.7393E7AF@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3B991346.7393E7AF@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13.99+cvs.2001.09.05.07.08 (Preview Release) Date: 07 Sep 2001 17:24:56 -0400 Message-Id: <999897902.839.3.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org For reference, I am using 2.4.9-ac9 + ext3-0.9.9 + dir_speedup + kpreempt with no problem. I have my root mounted as ext3, type ordered, with a local journal. I don't have any data points on performance gains, but I would be happy to provide any if you specify what. Everything feels good. I see no reason not to merge this into Alan's tree. At least ext3-0.9.9, but the directory speedup seems reasonable enough too. -- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net