From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262151AbVFRTdM (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:33:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262193AbVFRTdM (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:33:12 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]:35164 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262151AbVFRTdF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:33:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NzTgx4lNThlpwneKh9psXOyqxqD6dxmfI+XmmGAmPn1n4SKSMHv/K+g34WuLiq4WnB6MsI0IBhgUhLl4vIfvZWtCydza3X5ZpVA49WB7dRXpLM32kc5A1ZsPSwRbkUahq8zrtAtcH5v3RKT+FNRglWUw5C6jNDkuIuhcpi8hpPw= Message-ID: <9a8748490506181233675f2fd5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:33:05 +0200 From: Jesper Juhl Reply-To: Jesper Juhl To: Nick Warne Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.12 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200506182005.28254.nick@linicks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200506182005.28254.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/18/05, Nick Warne wrote: > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > This is somewhat experimental at this time, but it should be safe, > > as long as you aren't building this as a module and then removing it. > > > If unsure, say Y. Do not say M. > > > USB Monitor (USB_MON) [M/n/?] (NEW) > > -------------- > > > I really like my options. :-) > > > OK, I have CONFIG_USB as a module, but I really thought that this was > > pretty amusing. > > Heh. When I was sussing 2.6.12 stuff today, I really thought it was me > buggering up something. So after reading a lot, I wondered (neurotically) > if I was doing anything wrong (after all this time, it's likely). > > > make help reveals: > > randconfig - New config with random answer to all options > > So 'make randconfig' is the one to use! What one earth is that for? > Testing unusual combinations of build options to discover bugs that are rarely encountered during most peoples normal use. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html