From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262605AbVG2RAt (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:00:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262619AbVG2RAt (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:00:49 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.199]:28218 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262605AbVG2RAq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:00:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sAAGk1Y6RFsZet3qCj7+tVyblPB1cP0a9txHjea5fzyZrM1gjuGvKdSrfng+pjc68pbeqUfhlBTnMfBBvZfcsokH1MtKjEDXZCXZ5jOPaVSXtG/tsUdQMWAE74j9QBVPhV2oNjSJPyQ1uDZ4Feb8X0z/nR7WNx5LqHupVQv/xW8= Message-ID: <9a874849050729100050685530@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:00:15 +0200 From: Jesper Juhl Reply-To: Jesper Juhl To: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc4 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1122656138.19704@shark.he.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1122656138.19704@shark.he.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/29/05, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > On 7/29/05, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > Hey everybody, > > > > > > as many of you are aware, we were talking (not enough) about the > release > > > process at LKS this year. > > > > > > This ain't it. > > > > > > This is just the regular old release "process", with some LKS > backlog put > > > in for good measure. > > > > > > But the good news is, that I'll try the new release process after 2.6.13 > > > is out, which is hopefully not too far away. Which means that we should > > > try to let people know about the fact that if they want to merge stuff, > > > they should do so in the first two weeks after the 2.6.13 release, > and no > > > later (also, no earlier either, by now). > > > > > > > For the bennefit of those of us who were not at LKS, could someone > > elaborate a bit on "the new release process" ? > > > It's summarized here: > http://lwn.net/Articles/144281/ > Thank you for that link. It'll be interresting to see how that works out. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html