public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: "Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)" <saripalli@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@suse.de, Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 03:13:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a87484905080518133e0cdaf6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a87484905080406533ad143f9@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/4/05, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/4/05, Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD) <saripalli@hp.com> wrote:
> > Patch 1 of 2
> >
> > This patch fixes the "#error this is too much stack" in 2.6 kernel.
> > Using kmalloc to allocate memory to ulFibreFrame.
> >
> [snip]
> >            if( fchs->pl[0] == ELS_LILP_FRAME)
> >           {
> > +           kfree(ulFibreFrame);
> >              return 1; // found the LILP frame!
> >           }
> >           else
> >           {
> > +           kfree(ulFibreFrame);
> >             // keep looking...
> >           }
> 
> The first thing you do in either branch is to call
> kfree(ulFibreFrame); , so instead of having the call in both branches
> you might as well just have one call before the if().  Ohh and this
> looks like it could do with a CodingStyle cleanup as well.
> 
> kfree(ulFibreFrame);
> if (fchs->pl[0] == ELS_LILP_FRAME)
>         return 1; /* found the LILP frame! */
> /* keep looking */

Whoops, as Rolf Eike Beer pointed out to me, I snipped one line too many. 
  fchs = (TachFCHDR_GCMND*)ulFibreFrame;
So, the kfree inside each branch is correct. Freeing it just before
the if would be wrong.
Sorry about that.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

      reply	other threads:[~2005-08-06  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-04  4:39 [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)
2005-08-04  4:49 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04  9:38 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 12:13   ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-08-04 15:40   ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 15:56     ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 16:42       ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 17:11         ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 17:38           ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 13:53 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-06  1:13   ` Jesper Juhl [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a87484905080518133e0cdaf6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saripalli@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox