From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750804AbVHLTbO (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:31:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750757AbVHLTbN (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:31:13 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]:64180 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804AbVHLTbL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:31:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rhOQ09CyO9udQf00o6hys16YOHCWu++5fYsHGQXBOrU3wq1YSA1djlmnPzfPZ4OaXbKyAa8pK/2m0CTLHllf2X3Z/G4SoXcMaMKsv5j9KwCwjLVG5GxQDyoL85eEkHfQaZTXNXhUg3HI8l8+f64sTUuZ9fUyuq/Rr31NPidiVo4= Message-ID: <9a87484905081212317ca8c04e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:31:11 +0200 From: Jesper Juhl To: rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask Cc: Chris Wright , Jan Engelhardt , Linus Torvalds , gdt@linuxppc.org, Andrew Morton , Bodo Stroesser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Wilkens In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1123615983.18332.194.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1123618745.18332.204.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050809204928.GH7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1123621223.9553.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1123621637.9553.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1123643401.9553.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050812184503.GX7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/12/05, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de) wrote: > > > So, if in doubt what is really meant - check which of the two/three/+ > > > different behaviors the users out there favor most. > > > > Rather, check what happens in practice on other implementations. I don't > > have Solaris, HP-UX, Irix, AIX, etc. boxen at hand, but some folks must. > > > > I've supplied this before, but I'll send it again. Attached is a program > that should show the behavior of the sigaction. If someone has one of the > above mentioned boxes, please run this on the box and send back the > results. > I've got a 4-way pSeries p550 running AIX 5.3 here : $ uname -s -M -p -v -r AIX 3 5 powerpc IBM,9113-550 Output from your program : $ ./a.out Unknown return code!! Unknown return code!! Unknown return code!! Unknown return code!! Unknown return code!! Unknown return code!! sa_mask blocks sig -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html