public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shyam Kaushik <shyam@zadarastorage.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad with NFSD/SCTP
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:31:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a92eee58fefc1b8e3b4771ecf210d29@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi Folks,

We are using Ubuntu linux kernel 3.2.0-25-generic & 3.8.13-030813-generic
in our environments, but I think this bug is still present in mainline
kernel. Clients of IDR rollover at MAX_INT (NFSD & SCTP in kernel do this)
& others on MAX_IDR_MASK. This is ideally 2^31. But there is some BUG
within IDR that it wraps over at 2^30.

NFSD uses IDR for maintaining its stateids & tracks min_stateid with a
static variable which keeps incrementing. So over a period of time NFSD
could run into the issue that it allocates an ID with IDR, but IDR cant
locate this ID, resulting in NFSD constantly sending BAD_STATEIDS to all
its clients.

Following short driver (which closely resembles NFSD usage of IDR) shows
the BUG within IDR:

#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>

static int log_idr_entry(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
{
        int     *expected_val = (int *)ptr;

        pr_info("\tIDR Actual ID[%d] %s Expected Value[%d]\n", id, (id ==
*expected_val)?"==":"!=", *expected_val);
        return 0;
}

static void process_idr_entry(struct idr *stateids, int min_stateid)
{
        int             new_stid;
        int             error;

        pr_info("\nProcessing for min_stateid[%d]\n", min_stateid);
        if (!idr_pre_get(stateids, GFP_KERNEL)) {
                pr_info("Failed to pre-get\n");
                return;
        }

        error = idr_get_new_above(stateids, &new_stid, min_stateid,
&new_stid);
        if (error) {
                pr_info("Failed to get new id\n");
                idr_remove(stateids, new_stid);
                return;
        }

        pr_info("Allocated new_stid[%d]\n", new_stid);

        if (!idr_find(stateids, new_stid))
                pr_info("BUG: Cant find ID[%d]\n", new_stid);

        pr_info("Dumping entries in IDR\n");
        idr_for_each(stateids, &log_idr_entry, NULL);
        idr_remove(stateids, new_stid);
}

void driver_exit(void)
{
}

int driver_init(void)
{
        struct idr      stateids;

        pr_info("%d\n", MAX_INT);
        idr_init(&stateids);
        process_idr_entry(&stateids, 0/*min_stateid*/);
        process_idr_entry(&stateids, 1073741823/*min_stateid*/);
        process_idr_entry(&stateids, 1073741824/*min_stateid*/);
        idr_remove_all(&stateids);
        idr_destroy(&stateids);
        return 0;
}

module_init(driver_init);
module_exit(driver_exit);


Upon loading the driver, the following message shows up
[71641.440846] Processing for min_stateid[0]
[71641.440857] Allocated new_stid[0]
[71641.440859] Dumping entries in IDR
[71641.440861]  IDR Actual ID[0] == Expected Value[0]
[71641.440864]
[71641.440864] Processing for min_stateid[1073741823]
[71641.440867] Allocated new_stid[1073741823]
[71641.440868] Dumping entries in IDR
[71641.440876]  IDR Actual ID[1073741823] == Expected Value[1073741823]
[71641.440878]
[71641.440878] Processing for min_stateid[1073741824]
[71641.440883] Allocated new_stid[1073741824]
[71641.440884] BUG: Cant find ID[1073741824]
[71641.440886] Dumping entries in IDR
[71641.440887]  IDR Actual ID[0] != Expected Value[1073741824]

i.e. when we allocate a stated==1073741824, IDR internally has it as 0.

--Shyam

             reply	other threads:[~2013-08-13  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-13  7:01 Shyam Kaushik [this message]
2013-08-13  7:19 ` BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad with NFSD/SCTP Greg KH
2013-08-13  7:21   ` Shyam Kaushik
2013-08-13  7:26     ` Greg KH
2013-08-13  7:51       ` Shyam Kaushik
2013-08-13 14:51         ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-13  7:33 ` Greg KH
2013-08-13  7:34   ` Shyam Kaushik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a92eee58fefc1b8e3b4771ecf210d29@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shyam@zadarastorage.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox