public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix
Date: 11 Apr 2001 11:06:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b26el$3tr$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010411020058.B28670@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <E14nJjm-0006X8-00@the-village.bc.nu>

Followup to:  <E14nJjm-0006X8-00@the-village.bc.nu>
By author:    Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > 
> > Yes, and with CMPXCHG handler in the kernel it wouldn't be needed 
> > (the other 686 optimizations like memcpy also work on 386) 
> 
> They would still be needed. The 686 built glibc materially improves performance
> on 686 class machines. That one isnt an interesting problem to solve. Install
> the right software instead.
> 

Yes, the big 686 optimization is CMOV, and that one is
ultra-pervasive.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-11 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3AD0FD0F.9B0C47FD@uow.edu.au>
2001-04-09  3:08 ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-09  4:18   ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-09 13:55     ` rw_semaphores Ben LaHaise
2001-04-10  2:41   ` rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-04-10  5:43     ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10  6:33       ` rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-04-10  7:47       ` rw_semaphores David Howells
2001-04-10 18:02         ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
2001-04-10 19:42           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10 19:56             ` x86 cpu configuration (was: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix) Jeff Garzik
2001-04-10 21:58               ` Alan Cox
2001-04-10 20:05             ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
2001-04-10 20:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10 22:00               ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:00                 ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  0:13                   ` David Weinehall
2001-04-11  0:20                     ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  0:56                       ` David Weinehall
2001-04-11  1:04                         ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11 12:32                       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:55                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11  1:07                       ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  1:12                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11  1:23                           ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11 12:36                             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 18:05                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 12:28                   ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 18:06                     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2001-04-11 22:06                       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 22:42                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 22:55                           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-10 21:57             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:40               ` Tim Wright
2001-04-11  7:38             ` David Howells
2001-04-11 12:24               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-11 12:57             ` [PATCH] 2nd try: " David Howells
2001-04-11 16:37               ` [PATCH] 3rd " David Howells
2001-04-11 21:41                 ` [PATCH] 4th " David Howells
2001-04-12 18:16                   ` Andrew Morton
2001-04-11 23:00                 ` [PATCH] 3rd " Anton Blanchard
2001-04-12 15:06                   ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores, general abstraction patch David Howells
2001-04-11 16:56           ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andrew Morton
2001-04-11 17:36             ` David Howells
2001-04-11 18:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11 21:27             ` David Howells
2001-04-16 14:39         ` rw_semaphores yodaiken
2001-04-16 14:56           ` rw_semaphores Alan Cox
2001-04-16 17:05           ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-16 17:34             ` rw_semaphores yodaiken
2001-04-16 17:26           ` rw_semaphores Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='9b26el$3tr$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox