From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8063A31716D; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 06:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781593104; cv=none; b=grmwkbnzammSced0XIb+hPfsrnAH8uya+1nGz9pNL9JxTU02BFdYPSNWDQK0xILln6qR0A237B9VCDOeWqy/9LGzDnPsKzgdGZmqJsD/pWb+is7QBMgFCm0gk6mtmiLfiI6ys+wurk/YkpLFzhl9md4JChkv2IdRHhjNBEwh+y0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781593104; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fyv+pH0x71YVZXGQNKkzhJlqsSmxyeP9DdV6TpxS+sc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=AWw1R7PAYwkqP0OUjtImXygU9F0aDk+jguzeCpNpP41xIW4zIgkE9oQaMB+fhcFW7hQD1GCNxwNyzWRV5NQ9PMlcYyORAEM+Tp1IpXNw8ZZAjvQ2sFToo4Nlju8s71JRzjlzgzTPd4aKnzsvlnSa9BIkQCOpvtmScII/32OHsSc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=OJ3jJZ+X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="OJ3jJZ+X" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781593103; x=1813129103; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fyv+pH0x71YVZXGQNKkzhJlqsSmxyeP9DdV6TpxS+sc=; b=OJ3jJZ+XhXgiTm/GLOMgWjDpQ4fIw4XBVQoZRXqwFaugB6UC0R5/83Yl 2rNoymp9o+FwdIDM/A0N958A91x8Aeuu8juwk2vgXq1oSMA6bnuPTHdvD 3YuMJYpH0WfS8/9LvCmgMVwmTaZeh0GeSV0lnf/OhFFHjBsSYp0x14zKR f1Bn6iJTN4hCuTF8h3b20s/O4KZ521zXQzJiJpY6NvO7/Rw0HI9wtuGD+ gYoDj3xSAkijpBtxtmXsVTEcsgNu6MQkH9gqm55ftKaDgWIwFAj45rknB nyykfPHeVdFdUNZohOuP/ciGk+/NmB/9Mm+NZpUqn5lpyl9rdJvLX6I0I w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wyVuinIYSISsxjKFW+FR+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2o2LqQEeQryBdmCg3nEYew== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11818"; a="86189008" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,207,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="86189008" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2026 23:58:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WvHKw9nhT0mEovUaDM23mQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: sM5c6+DcQeW1z6R7zfZo9g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,207,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="271405460" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.238.2.24]) ([10.238.2.24]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2026 23:58:20 -0700 Message-ID: <9bf44206-74c1-441c-84ef-a30638cefda5@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:58:18 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 25/30] KVM: x86: Move kvm_pv_send_ipi() declaration from kvm_host.h => lapic.h To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yosry Ahmed , Kai Huang References: <20260613000329.732085-1-seanjc@google.com> <20260613000329.732085-26-seanjc@google.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Binbin Wu In-Reply-To: <20260613000329.732085-26-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/13/2026 8:03 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Move the declaration of kvm_pv_send_ipi() into lapic.h, as its > implementation is provided by lapic.c (sending PV IPIs relies on the > optimized APIC map provided by the in-kernel local APIC), and it's only > used by KVM x86 code. > > No functional change intended. > > Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed > Reviewed-by: Kai Huang > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu