public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	ananth.narayan@amd.com, ravi.bangoria@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: adjust LBR regardless of filtering
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:31:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c40ef91-b7fc-5ee6-2ab5-446a10f8c00a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220928184043.408364-3-eranian@google.com>

On 9/29/2022 12:10 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> In case of fused compare and taken branch instructions, the AMD LBR points to
> the compare instruction instead of the branch. Users of LBR usually expects
> the from address to point to a branch instruction. The kernel has code to
> adjust the from address via get_branch_type_fused(). However this correction
> is only applied when a branch filter is applied. That means that if no
> filter is present, the quality of the data is lower.
> 
> Fix the problem by applying the adjustment regardless of the filter setting,
> bringing the AMD LBR to the same level as other LBR implementations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> index 2e1c1573efe7..38a75216c12c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> @@ -99,12 +99,13 @@ static void amd_pmu_lbr_filter(void)
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>  	int br_sel = cpuc->br_sel, offset, type, i, j;
>  	bool compress = false;
> +	bool fused_only = false;
>  	u64 from, to;
>  
>  	/* If sampling all branches, there is nothing to filter */
>  	if (((br_sel & X86_BR_ALL) == X86_BR_ALL) &&
>  	    ((br_sel & X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE) != X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE))
> -		return;
> +		fused_only = true;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < cpuc->lbr_stack.nr; i++) {
>  		from = cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from;
> @@ -116,8 +117,11 @@ static void amd_pmu_lbr_filter(void)
>  		 * fusion where it points to an instruction preceding the
>  		 * actual branch
>  		 */
> -		if (offset)
> +		if (offset) {
>  			cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from += offset;
> +			if (fused_only)
> +				continue;
> +		}
>  
>  		/* If type does not correspond, then discard */
>  		if (type == X86_BR_NONE || (br_sel & type) != type) {

Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-28 18:40 [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: fix LBR filtering support Stephane Eranian
2022-09-28 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/utils: fix uninitialized var in get_branch_type() Stephane Eranian
2022-09-29  7:00   ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-30  9:31   ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/utils: Fix " tip-bot2 for Stephane Eranian
2022-09-28 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: adjust LBR regardless of filtering Stephane Eranian
2022-09-29  7:01   ` Sandipan Das [this message]
2022-09-30  9:31   ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Adjust " tip-bot2 for Stephane Eranian
2022-09-29  8:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: fix LBR filtering support Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-29  8:30   ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-29 10:19     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c40ef91-b7fc-5ee6-2ab5-446a10f8c00a@amd.com \
    --to=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox