From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2
Date: 24 Apr 2001 09:24:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c49bk$fd3$1@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cpxu23etpmc.fsf@goat.cs.wisc.edu>
[ Alan, I'm lazy and only have 2.2.14 sources on-line. Maybe this has
been fixed already and there's something else going on. Worth a look ]
In article <cpxu23etpmc.fsf@goat.cs.wisc.edu>,
Victor Zandy <zandy@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>
>Someone else here traced the process flags of a FP-intensive program
>on a machine before and after it is put in the faulty FPU state. He
>periodically sampled /proc/pid/stat while the program was running.
>
>He found that PF_USEDFPU was always set before the machine was broken.
>After he found that it was set about 70% of the time.
[ Looks closer at the ptrace synchronization ]
Ahh.. This actually _does_ look like a race on "current->flags":
PTRACE_ATTACH will do a
child->flags |= PF_PTRACED;
without waiting for the child to have stopped.
(Aside: thinking more about the stopping logic - I'm not actually sure
the ptrace synchronization is complete wrt scheduling, as there will be
a window when the process has set the task state to TASK_STOPPED but
hasn't actually yet scheduled away. Oh, well).
All other ptrace operations (not counting killing the child) will check
that the child is quiescent. But PTRACE_ATTACH will not, as we're just
setting up the stopping.
In 2.4.x, this bug doesn't happen because "flags" was split up into
"current->ptrace" and "current->flags". Exactly because of locking
concerns.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-24 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-24 13:05 BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2001-04-24 16:47 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-04-24 18:09 ` Victor Zandy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-24 18:21 Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 18:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-24 19:17 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-24 8:56 alad
2001-04-24 7:56 alad
2001-04-24 5:33 alad
2001-04-19 16:05 Victor Zandy
2001-04-19 20:18 ` Michal Jaegermann
2001-04-20 18:50 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-20 19:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-20 19:20 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-20 19:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-20 19:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-20 19:37 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-20 20:20 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-20 21:44 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-22 1:46 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-22 2:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 2:30 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-22 18:39 ` David Konerding
2001-04-22 18:59 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 20:59 ` kees
2001-04-23 16:11 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-04-23 18:44 ` Erik Paulson
2001-04-24 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-24 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-24 16:56 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-04-24 20:15 ` Michal Jaegermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9c49bk$fd3$1@penguin.transmeta.com' \
--to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox