Re: [PATCH V1 RESEND] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for ExynosAutoV920 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 26/02/2025 08:21, Sangwook Shin wrote:
> From: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> 
> Fix the PMU register bits for the ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
> This SoC has different bit information compared to its previous
> version, ExynosAutoV9, and we have made the necessary adjustments.
> 
> rst_stat_bit:
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 0
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 1
> 
> cnt_en_bit:
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 8
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 8
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@samsung.com>

Resending while ignoring all previous emails, so we should do the work
twice. If you ever wonder why your patches are not applied, you got answer.


<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>


Best regards,
Krzysztof