public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] btrfs: add raid stripe tree definitions
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 06:00:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cae9239-2a07-6477-da53-275944e8ce25@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230911-raid-stripe-tree-v8-1-647676fa852c@wdc.com>

On 9/11/23 21:52, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Add definitions for the raid stripe tree. This tree will hold information
> about the on-disk layout of the stripes in a RAID set.
> 
> Each stripe extent has a 1:1 relationship with an on-disk extent item and
> is doing the logical to per-drive physical address translation for the
> extent item in question.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/accessors.h            | 10 ++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/locking.c              |  5 +++--
>  include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/accessors.h b/fs/btrfs/accessors.h
> index f958eccff477..977ff160a024 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/accessors.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/accessors.h
> @@ -306,6 +306,16 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(timespec_nsec, struct btrfs_timespec, nsec, 32);
>  BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_timespec_sec, struct btrfs_timespec, sec, 64);
>  BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_timespec_nsec, struct btrfs_timespec, nsec, 32);
>  
> +BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(stripe_extent_encoding, struct btrfs_stripe_extent, encoding, 8);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(raid_stride_devid, struct btrfs_raid_stride, devid, 64);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(raid_stride_physical, struct btrfs_raid_stride, physical, 64);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(raid_stride_length, struct btrfs_raid_stride, length, 64);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_stripe_extent_encoding,
> +			 struct btrfs_stripe_extent, encoding, 8);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_raid_stride_devid, struct btrfs_raid_stride, devid, 64);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_raid_stride_physical, struct btrfs_raid_stride, physical, 64);
> +BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_raid_stride_length, struct btrfs_raid_stride, length, 64);
> +
>  /* struct btrfs_dev_extent */
>  BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(dev_extent_chunk_tree, struct btrfs_dev_extent, chunk_tree, 64);
>  BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(dev_extent_chunk_objectid, struct btrfs_dev_extent,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> index 6ac4fd8cc8dc..e7760d40feab 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@
>  
>  static struct btrfs_lockdep_keyset {
>  	u64			id;		/* root objectid */
> -	/* Longest entry: btrfs-block-group-00 */
> -	char			names[BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL][24];
> +	/* Longest entry: btrfs-raid-stripe-tree-00 */
> +	char			names[BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL][25];
>  	struct lock_class_key	keys[BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL];
>  } btrfs_lockdep_keysets[] = {
>  	{ .id = BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID,	DEFINE_NAME("root")	},
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static struct btrfs_lockdep_keyset {
>  	{ .id = BTRFS_UUID_TREE_OBJECTID,	DEFINE_NAME("uuid")	},
>  	{ .id = BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_TREE_OBJECTID,	DEFINE_NAME("free-space") },
>  	{ .id = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TREE_OBJECTID, DEFINE_NAME("block-group") },
> +	{ .id = BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_TREE_OBJECTID,DEFINE_NAME("raid-stripe-tree") },
>  	{ .id = 0,				DEFINE_NAME("tree")	},
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> index fc3c32186d7e..3fb758ce3ac0 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> @@ -4,9 +4,8 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/btrfs.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
> -#else
> +#ifndef __KERNEL__
>  #include <stddef.h>
>  #endif

This change seems unrelated to the RAID stripe tree. Should this be a patch on
its own ?

>  
> @@ -73,6 +72,9 @@
>  /* Holds the block group items for extent tree v2. */
>  #define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TREE_OBJECTID 11ULL
>  
> +/* tracks RAID stripes in block groups. */
> +#define BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_TREE_OBJECTID 12ULL
> +
>  /* device stats in the device tree */
>  #define BTRFS_DEV_STATS_OBJECTID 0ULL
>  
> @@ -285,6 +287,8 @@
>   */
>  #define BTRFS_QGROUP_RELATION_KEY       246
>  
> +#define BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_KEY		247
> +
>  /*
>   * Obsolete name, see BTRFS_TEMPORARY_ITEM_KEY.
>   */
> @@ -719,6 +723,31 @@ struct btrfs_free_space_header {
>  	__le64 num_bitmaps;
>  } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
>  
> +struct btrfs_raid_stride {
> +	/* btrfs device-id this raid extent lives on */
> +	__le64 devid;
> +	/* physical location on disk */
> +	__le64 physical;
> +	/* length of stride on this disk */
> +	__le64 length;
> +};
> +
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_DUP	0
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID0	1
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID1	2
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID1C3	3
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID1C4	4
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID5	5
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID6	6
> +#define BTRFS_STRIPE_RAID10	7
> +
> +struct btrfs_stripe_extent {
> +	__u8 encoding;
> +	__u8 reserved[7];
> +	/* array of raid strides this stripe is composed of */
> +	__DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct btrfs_raid_stride, strides);
> +};
> +
>  #define BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN	(1ULL << 0)
>  #define BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC		(1ULL << 1)
>  
> 

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-11 12:52 [PATCH v8 00/11] btrfs: introduce RAID stripe tree Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] btrfs: add raid stripe tree definitions Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 21:00   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-09-12  6:09     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-12 20:32   ` David Sterba
2023-09-13  6:02     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-13 14:49       ` David Sterba
2023-09-13 14:57         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-13 16:06           ` David Sterba
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] btrfs: read raid-stripe-tree from disk Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-14  9:27   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-09-14  9:33     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] btrfs: add support for inserting raid stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-13 16:50   ` David Sterba
2023-09-13 16:57   ` David Sterba
2023-09-14  9:25   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-09-14  9:51     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-14 10:06       ` Qu Wenruo
2023-09-14 15:35         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] btrfs: delete stripe extent on extent deletion Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] btrfs: lookup physical address from stripe extent Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-14  9:18   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-09-14  9:45     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-14 14:16     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] btrfs: implement RST version of scrub Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-13  9:51   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-09-13 16:59   ` David Sterba
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] btrfs: zoned: allow zoned RAID Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-12 20:49   ` David Sterba
2023-09-13  5:41     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-13 14:52       ` David Sterba
2023-09-13 14:59         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] btrfs: add raid stripe tree pretty printer Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-12 20:42   ` David Sterba
2023-09-13  5:34     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] btrfs: announce presence of raid-stripe-tree in sysfs Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] btrfs: add trace events for RST Johannes Thumshirn
2023-09-12 20:46   ` David Sterba
2023-09-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] btrfs: add raid-stripe-tree to features enabled with debug Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cae9239-2a07-6477-da53-275944e8ce25@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox