The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Yu-Che Cheng <giver@chromium.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: gov_power_allocator: Fix incorrect calculation in divvy_up_power
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:35:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc02f9e-9326-4fe1-820b-ca725f68de29@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jSh=aOfP7BKTCSxnPGy-XKJKcHNw8bN5PXPH0LA0tAGg@mail.gmail.com>



On 2/20/25 19:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Yu-Che Cheng <giver@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> divvy_up_power should use weighted_req_power instead of req_power to
>> calculate the granted_power. Otherwise, the granted_power may be
>> unexpected as the denominator total_req_power is weighted sum.
> 
> Yes, this is what's happening, to my eyes.
> 
>> This is a mistake during the previous refactor.
>>
>> Replace the req_power with weighted_req_power in divvy_up_power
>> calculation.
>>
>> Fixes: 912e97c67cc3 ("thermal: gov_power_allocator: Move memory allocation out of throttle()")
>> Signed-off-by: Yu-Che Cheng <giver@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> index 3b644de3292e..3b626db55b2b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void divvy_up_power(struct power_actor *power, int num_actors,
>>
>>          for (i = 0; i < num_actors; i++) {
>>                  struct power_actor *pa = &power[i];
>> -               u64 req_range = (u64)pa->req_power * power_range;
>> +               u64 req_range = (u64)pa->weighted_req_power * power_range;
>>
>>                  pa->granted_power = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(req_range,
>>                                                            total_req_power);
>>
>> ---
> 
> And the fix looks good to me.
> 
> Lukasz, any concerns?

Good catch! It went through since the test didn't set different weights.

Thanks for the fix!

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-21 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19  7:07 [PATCH] thermal: gov_power_allocator: Fix incorrect calculation in divvy_up_power Yu-Che Cheng
2025-02-20 19:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-21 10:35   ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2025-02-21 17:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cc02f9e-9326-4fe1-820b-ca725f68de29@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=giver@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox