From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
kevin.tian@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, lukas@wunner.de
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:26:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc2010f-269c-4d23-b284-6fe4162f8810@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a9c38ec-1dc2-40d3-99eb-02b87be660a6@linux.intel.com>
On 1/18/2024 8:46 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 1/17/24 5:00 PM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * If the ATS invalidation target device is gone this moment
>> (surprise
>> + * removed, died, no response) don't try this request again.
>> this
>> + * request will not get valid result anymore. but the request
>> was
>> + * already submitted to hardware and we predict to get a ITE in
>> + * followed batch of request, if so, it will get handled then.
>> + */
>> + if (target_pdev && !pci_device_is_present(target_pdev))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Again, we should not ignore the error triggered by the current request.
> Do not leave it to the next one. The WAIT descriptor is a fence. Handle
> everything within its boundary.
We didn't set fence bit to every ATS invalidation wait descriptor,
only the intel_drain_pasid_prq() queue a drain page requests with FN
sit, but that is not called in hotplug removal path.
Thanks,
Ethan
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-28 17:02 [RFC PATCH v10 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device Ethan Zhao
2023-12-28 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v10 1/5] iommu/vt-d: add pci_dev parameter to qi_submit_sync and refactor callers Ethan Zhao
2024-01-10 4:59 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-10 7:51 ` Ethan Zhao
2023-12-28 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v10 2/5] iommu/vt-d: break out ATS Invalidation if target device is gone Ethan Zhao
2024-01-10 5:17 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-10 8:29 ` Ethan Zhao
2023-12-29 8:18 ` [RFC PATCH v10 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device Tian, Kevin
2023-12-29 9:28 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-09 1:24 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-15 7:58 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-17 3:24 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-17 5:26 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-17 5:38 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-17 9:00 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-18 0:46 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-18 2:26 ` Ethan Zhao [this message]
2024-01-18 2:32 ` Ethan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cc2010f-269c-4d23-b284-6fe4162f8810@linux.intel.com \
--to=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox