Re: [RFC PATCH] soc: audio-graph-card2: use correct endpoint when getting link parameters

[Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>]

Hi,


On 13.01.25 г. 15:40 ч., Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 07:55:30AM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>> ping
> 
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
> 
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.
> 
> Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
> readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> discussion is being addressed.

I understand people are busy, but I also see community sent patches 
being treated with low priority, or being silently ignored too often 
lately, but lets not go into that.

I sent that RFC patch on 20.12.2024, today is 13.10.2025 - if this is 
not a reasonable time, well, what is? By the same time I sent 2 other 
patches and they are already in -next. In the meanwhile I see patches 
sent in the morning to be reviewed till the end of the day - not 
critical bugfixes patches but new functionality.

Also, I don't understand how the ping was content free, given that it 
was on top of the original patch, unless I don't get what "content free" 
is supposed to mean, possible, I am not native English speaker.


Regards,
Ivo