From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com (mail-ej1-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2964725760 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736785463; cv=none; b=FFwNKiRVSDi2gv0jNJSgmmvrViPakEutwZIzO+QoW3IYBIjLYG0Z2Gy+jUVijMtXaTZUAvlPBHRMH88vshRl8UDOAqfTfSpLmv03ivUoD5ZLeUdfrECesBBG3wvoStSQfOW3ed/0seqhsg9UEO+RrvUQbUEoRUULU6NEREjDahE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736785463; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cNfKGnLXy9xh6jNlIjsSKM/lH49C7ButJrc9pNjIok0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pIdoHDRDVDaHE9/r/G/qLv6Et70EpbD8bJ/lqrnFsG58e72JVWiM2LJygFK+83gs9CawXEIJJ1gz90mlYOQUIPWQpZ6HLH1pwiMf7blt45ziJfWzoFHk0i12957wonsgWlc5CGodzS0t9B0fwDTI4LfP23ydNSOt3Ok6Ayh+bOw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=gf7AdfzV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gf7AdfzV" Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aab6fa3e20eso816257566b.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:24:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1736785460; x=1737390260; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4RNMXJoSlNAsDthEL7GrP8/twpDoJdm/wqZQmG0HeqM=; b=gf7AdfzVdk20mKzgVEd2w1AETnyJON0u/vU6f9NMkgPV+rgrBq6oTOiIAAVpZ0I6CV LeEuD9nlA0EAZaqphTJuOaZWQQEKPUHT5bSLJK8cvmMEhsnOnYe6mrCglLGfLSld0IL9 CIxCYr2ydLKtFpT8dFkUSD75wAIwx/OSp+TEYg0/m0M/hYGWtplo1TxmsISJx9MbnNCs lHzWUmoAeC7r+P4bGEQZWJmg/EeZp2SpWqb5lxa6SpdsDQVEWmQyX6QYpCk7sFPIoq3U YAqkmKASvf+5SCsFKojThBAyhsCYhG+8SRRPySlG8punWO5nq5zY2jwONdaqoV3OMT7v XTEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736785460; x=1737390260; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4RNMXJoSlNAsDthEL7GrP8/twpDoJdm/wqZQmG0HeqM=; b=jDF1U1+6OJdf87b/3tH6qXb3OkQK569E/NCdxIRf/wXRDrCqjTQauomf2LKVW/Cj/9 LAyo1oEWZoHGTmr555MadmXo6w4vHhdFqttc5m0to5xEr8i3E07nwT1B4kdmJI92Q91y TexbX2hDUZSHikEu1FX2+JckPLumINq2CccrbXj2xqwgOfiaVQbGLOjKnObakxfcuqSA TbhPlnhJmDyB5YJ0IH7IlIuReHxXBnV9emeGQrNEfLaWsINJQ04s2G7yij7mqGkgM4D8 lwPNjYtTDEo1jFYL8B/TzhnnhgBLinthaPHbxG+JfFTouiUxdN9O7QbNFJqwpx468jlr 1jwg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVsOM95ialETLhfr9NKPrmMt88D2/ywtxSHe24n1nKwMpULM2z6M8TlF3v1JE97zbS6YEdsFjS3w3eQQN4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxGuze/M9Wi+rAMkcEw2RujgmFez7cuMZkTEwfXMRHnSFbr1o++ bb5bByNmr9dftudY7tetjsmqRmeQ19aQbj+MwoINUA4EXL588Zbp X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvHEAi3u78dJWVZ0vL0HIrxlqcQy9eq2UWU8JEfUYuRDHWAsfDg62lxoHVkQbc QgukDo6vhbls4G0/bpkaCEbxRGbqAjGEazTL7+l7dJygD2UoJRsKsh0eXsG2t7UoaARmcsneNn7 qjbNuV1Di+mavOPswXpdPbhcBOOhxOmvnS/js50s0E1+rSYkAKY46I4/O3ikOZt5YrZx8HhsGjJ HHDPPrlQrUepjLdx4fd1rWCNYvcz57YCalWZCUbuvJgyGAsJgSC2wLWAc7eukehW5Ib7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGj2Ek+R+vKBPVyf74QZTI0MH2EW+YfhMRR26E+09AjC6EgU3PutjaTzgoz2yBN27NVfWVPMw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7faa:b0:aa6:832b:8d76 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ab2ab6766c4mr2053667366b.12.1736785459950; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:24:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([95.43.220.235]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-ab2c95647efsm518799966b.117.2025.01.13.08.24.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:24:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9cc6c2ad-0811-482d-91c8-d162bd7f09f4@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:24:18 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] soc: audio-graph-card2: use correct endpoint when getting link parameters To: Mark Brown Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, tony@atomide.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Merlijn Wajer References: <20241220071126.1066691-1-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Ivaylo Dimitrov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On 13.01.25 г. 15:40 ч., Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 07:55:30AM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: >> ping > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. > > Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows > readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what > you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the > discussion is being addressed. I understand people are busy, but I also see community sent patches being treated with low priority, or being silently ignored too often lately, but lets not go into that. I sent that RFC patch on 20.12.2024, today is 13.10.2025 - if this is not a reasonable time, well, what is? By the same time I sent 2 other patches and they are already in -next. In the meanwhile I see patches sent in the morning to be reviewed till the end of the day - not critical bugfixes patches but new functionality. Also, I don't understand how the ping was content free, given that it was on top of the original patch, unless I don't get what "content free" is supposed to mean, possible, I am not native English speaker. Regards, Ivo