From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:57:24 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc7401e7137e27cd2f02625aab23330@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260221185418.29319-1-longman@redhat.com>
Hello,
> Waiman Long (8):
> cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect change to effective_xcpus in partition_xcpus_del()
> cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect use of cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask() in update_cpumasks_hier()
> cgroup/cpuset: Clarify exclusion rules for cpuset internal variables
> cgroup/cpuset: Set isolated_cpus_updating only if isolated_cpus is changed
> kselftest/cgroup: Simplify test_cpuset_prs.sh by removing "S+" command
> cgroup/cpuset: Move housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together
> cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue
> cgroup/cpuset: Call housekeeping_update() without holding cpus_read_lock
Applied 1-8 to cgroup/for-7.0-fixes with the following minor fixups:
- 5/8: Removed a duplicate test entry that resulted from the "S+"
removal (two previously-different lines becoming identical).
- 8/8: Fixed typos in commit message ("essentally" -> "essentially",
"beforce" -> "before") and code comment ("top_cpuset_mutex" ->
"cpuset_top_mutex").
This has gone through more than enough iterations. We can resolve further
issues if there's any incrementally.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-21 18:54 [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect change to effective_xcpus in partition_xcpus_del() Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect use of cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask() in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Clarify exclusion rules for cpuset internal variables Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] cgroup/cpuset: Set isolated_cpus_updating only if isolated_cpus is changed Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kselftest/cgroup: Simplify test_cpuset_prs.sh by removing "S+" command Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Move housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue Waiman Long
2026-02-26 16:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-03 22:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-04 4:05 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-02 11:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 15:18 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-03 16:09 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-04 3:58 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-04 11:07 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-04 18:11 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] cgroup/cpuset: Call housekeeping_update() without holding cpus_read_lock Waiman Long
2026-03-02 12:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-02 14:15 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-02 15:40 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-23 20:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-02-23 21:11 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues Waiman Long
2026-02-24 7:51 ` Chen Ridong
2026-03-02 12:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cc7401e7137e27cd2f02625aab23330@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox