From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BAF3369984; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771880246; cv=none; b=pXnCwP1cxOWes78M4Bta9vcvCu61EAG13bWBPEUH4ytz/zbOD/pW0stV+4+PgGDqK2Qz0zJbWepY/S92za0SdPUNV+Dhgr+GrHm6eoznUXIkDHwkx1bnI9b4Ia52xYWaL2DhXIMc+vJDwR0e3DOvM7Bo4N/g3/oj6hMNJgflCCQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771880246; c=relaxed/simple; bh=inoIZdNuHbSRzVDVc72NG8TR/m8kk/DIfYd0g1QefBo=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=m7cb2bV7JnhkFaFwqfJe+78RP+4fZiyJaeIBnNyKNhA6eJPhAIKfhN9CnAVKSAdyD5h5nqZGc6OgCC0xSyMhBPX3iynfjn+WT+62Si5JFaAuFCxKjEubuBlFpXXyzXySqcELKC/vbxpK7UcZFggn54psj4KlOvIMm/znoAHiz1o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=vDuURTdR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="vDuURTdR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CAD0C116C6; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:57:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771880245; bh=inoIZdNuHbSRzVDVc72NG8TR/m8kk/DIfYd0g1QefBo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vDuURTdRjQyGkuH0p6oGKtGuaURt1B7N47SUWSriuMf8N3+UYhGlb42k5SrTUdfRa Z6RUc0YDPKpcgZYSW337efDuzCeEJ5k4nQSCKdofZeyJA5cbeJylvY6L4WUxcqOUph z06F+j/DMkWLQhzXN+nY8G5LTru6SrvZPdVTdmWo2qpSfEXOmxhLbTEKzKy5/LXuCw QvQZ3U9MLaVS/U2BXX0itG3VrFg0AoWL0MtTzg5nYvyPdRsXngNBvRNDqVlCKNag99 PnuwzY8S9jXMEOAx59LFt3NU2LcUXAsZxBGaOrPoB4Vtdv8aXYZdXIxtpz5buGm6R6 31cjkBJxllakg== Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:57:24 -1000 Message-ID: <9cc7401e7137e27cd2f02625aab23330@kernel.org> From: Tejun Heo To: Waiman Long Cc: Chen Ridong , Johannes Weiner , Michal Koutny , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Shuah Khan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues In-Reply-To: <20260221185418.29319-1-longman@redhat.com> References: <20260221185418.29319-1-longman@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello, > Waiman Long (8): > cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect change to effective_xcpus in partition_xcpus_del() > cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect use of cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask() in update_cpumasks_hier() > cgroup/cpuset: Clarify exclusion rules for cpuset internal variables > cgroup/cpuset: Set isolated_cpus_updating only if isolated_cpus is changed > kselftest/cgroup: Simplify test_cpuset_prs.sh by removing "S+" command > cgroup/cpuset: Move housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together > cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue > cgroup/cpuset: Call housekeeping_update() without holding cpus_read_lock Applied 1-8 to cgroup/for-7.0-fixes with the following minor fixups: - 5/8: Removed a duplicate test entry that resulted from the "S+" removal (two previously-different lines becoming identical). - 8/8: Fixed typos in commit message ("essentally" -> "essentially", "beforce" -> "before") and code comment ("top_cpuset_mutex" -> "cpuset_top_mutex"). This has gone through more than enough iterations. We can resolve further issues if there's any incrementally. Thanks. -- tejun