From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Constify local snd_sof_dsp_ops
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:43:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d1eda85-32a0-4e53-86ca-ce3137439bd7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89f8f0be-2534-46c8-9058-cabea4f68568@linux.intel.com>
On 15/04/2024 16:19, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>> The core code does not modify the 'struct snd_sof_dsp_ops' passed via
>> pointer in various places, so this can be made pointer to const.
>
> The structure itself is NOT always const - the initialization itself
> does have platform-specific changes, so what do we really gain from all
> this?
In the context of these patches, the structure is *always* const. In
other drivers, it is not, but they are not really relevant here.
>
> some commit messages say the code is "a bit safer", but I personally
> find the 'const' more confusing since the information that the structure
> can be modified during initialization is lost.
Functions which take some data and do not modify it are easier to read
if the pointed data is marked as const. Then it is obvious that
functions for example is re-entrant. Or that it does not affect the
state of other devices/core structures.
Additionally, the static data is safer when is const, because it cannot
be used in some attacks.
I really do not understand which information you lost here? Core does
not change the ops, so the data should be passed as const as often as
possible. If anyone wants to write a driver which does not use static
ops, but somehow dynamically allocated and changed, nothing stops him.
This patch did not make it less readable/doable.
The point is that these ops do not differ from other ops or some other
driver-passed structures, which we have around 100 already in checkpatch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-14 18:47 [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Constify local snd_sof_dsp_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] ASoC: SOF: debug: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-26 2:09 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-26 7:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-26 8:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] ASoC: SOF: ipc3: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] ASoC: SOF: pcm: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] ASoC: SOF: Constify stored pointer to snd_sof_dsp_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] ASoC: SOF: intel: pci-tng: Constify snd_sof_dsp_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] ASoC: SOF: intel: hda: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] ASoC: SOF: amd: acp: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] ASoC: SOF: imx8: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] ASoC: SOF: imx8m: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] ASoC: SOF: imx8ulp: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] ASoC: SOF: intel: bdw: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] ASoC: SOF: intel: byt: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] ASoC: SOF: mediatek: mt8186: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-15 10:49 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] ASoC: SOF: mediatek: mt8195: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-15 10:49 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Constify local snd_sof_dsp_ops Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-04-22 5:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-04-22 15:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-04-22 19:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-22 20:42 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-04-22 20:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-22 21:24 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-04-23 9:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-23 15:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-04-23 16:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-25 16:12 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-05-01 13:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d1eda85-32a0-4e53-86ca-ce3137439bd7@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox