From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] arm64: mm: Optimize linear_map_split_to_ptes()
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:27:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d666caf-a799-4229-86b5-3a22a60fa79f@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829115250.2395585-7-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
On 8/29/25 4:52 AM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> When splitting kernel leaf mappings, either via
> split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked() or linear_map_split_to_ptes(),
> previously a leaf mapping was always split to the next size down. e.g.
> pud -> contpmd -> pmd -> contpte -> pte. But for
> linear_map_split_to_ptes() we can avoid the contpmd and contpte states
> because we know we want to split all the way down to ptes.
>
> This avoids visiting all the ptes in a table if it was created by
> splitting a pmd, which is noticible on systems with a lot of memory.
Similar to patch #4, this patch should be squashed into patch #5 IMHO.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 6bd0b065bd97..8e45cd08bf3a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void split_contpte(pte_t *ptep)
> __set_pte(ptep, pte_mknoncont(__ptep_get(ptep)));
> }
>
> -static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp)
> +static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
> {
> pmdval_t tableprot = PMD_TYPE_TABLE | PMD_TABLE_UXN | PMD_TABLE_AF;
> unsigned long pfn = pmd_pfn(pmd);
> @@ -568,7 +568,9 @@ static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp)
> tableprot |= PMD_TABLE_PXN;
>
> prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TYPE_MASK) | PTE_TYPE_PAGE);
> - prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_CONT);
> + if (to_cont)
> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>
> for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, ptep++, pfn++)
> __set_pte(ptep, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
> @@ -592,7 +594,7 @@ static void split_contpmd(pmd_t *pmdp)
> set_pmd(pmdp, pmd_mknoncont(pmdp_get(pmdp)));
> }
>
> -static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp)
> +static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
> {
> pudval_t tableprot = PUD_TYPE_TABLE | PUD_TABLE_UXN | PUD_TABLE_AF;
> unsigned int step = PMD_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -611,7 +613,9 @@ static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp)
> tableprot |= PUD_TABLE_PXN;
>
> prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PMD_TYPE_MASK) | PMD_TYPE_SECT);
> - prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_CONT);
> + if (to_cont)
> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>
> for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++, pmdp++, pfn += step)
> set_pmd(pmdp, pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
> @@ -669,7 +673,7 @@ static int split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked(unsigned long addr)
> if (!pud_present(pud))
> goto out;
> if (pud_leaf(pud)) {
> - ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL);
> + ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, true);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -694,7 +698,7 @@ static int split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked(unsigned long addr)
> */
> if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PMD_SIZE) == addr)
> goto out;
> - ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL);
> + ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, true);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -771,7 +775,7 @@ static int __init split_to_ptes_pud_entry(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (pud_leaf(pud))
> - ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_ATOMIC, false);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -786,7 +790,13 @@ static int __init split_to_ptes_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> if (pmd_leaf(pmd)) {
> if (pmd_cont(pmd))
> split_contpmd(pmdp);
> - ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_ATOMIC, false);
> +
> + /*
> + * We have split the pmd directly to ptes so there is no need to
> + * visit each pte to check if they are contpte.
> + */
> + walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 11:52 [PATCH v7 0/6] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] arm64: Enable permission change on arm64 kernel block mappings Ryan Roberts
[not found] ` <7705c29b-4f08-4b56-aab3-024795ee9124@huawei.com>
2025-09-04 11:06 ` Ryan Roberts
[not found] ` <a985c9f0-1561-45d7-860f-2717a0a72d9e@huawei.com>
2025-09-04 13:21 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] arm64: cpufeature: add AmpereOne to BBML2 allow list Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 22:08 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 11:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-03 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04 0:49 ` Yang Shi
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full Ryan Roberts
2025-09-03 19:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04 0:52 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 11:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 11:15 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 14:57 ` Yang Shi
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] arm64: mm: Optimize split_kernel_leaf_mapping() Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 22:11 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-03 19:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04 11:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 unsupported on secondary CPUs Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 16:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04 17:54 ` Yang Shi
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] arm64: mm: Optimize linear_map_split_to_ptes() Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 22:27 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2025-09-04 11:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 14:58 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 17:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-01 5:04 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full Dev Jain
2025-09-01 8:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-03 0:21 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-03 0:50 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 13:14 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 13:16 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 17:47 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d666caf-a799-4229-86b5-3a22a60fa79f@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).