From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@gmail.com>,
Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@unisoc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:04:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dd68b0e-e36a-b87c-e66d-586f2442da6c@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921122527.15261-2-Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
On 9/21/2023 8:25 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
LGTM. And this also deserves a Fixes tag.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> struct regmap *map;
> u32 offset;
> - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> struct mutex buslock;
> int irq;
> };
> @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
>
> gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> }
> @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>
> gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
> }
>
> static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> switch (flow_type) {
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> } else {
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
> }
>
> /* Set irq unmask */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
>
> mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-21 12:25 [PATCH V2 0/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Modification of UNISOC Platform PMIC EIC Driver Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
2023-09-27 7:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:04 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-09-27 9:24 ` Chunyan Zhang
2023-09-27 9:49 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-28 9:00 ` Chunyan Zhang
2024-01-02 7:29 ` wenhua lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 15:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 7:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:05 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dd68b0e-e36a-b87c-e66d-586f2442da6c@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=wenhua.lin1994@gmail.com \
--cc=xiongpeng.wu@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox