From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wu Zongyo <wuzongyo@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Treat all "skip" emulation for SEV guests as outright failures
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:43:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dddb2ef-e021-087d-f0ea-9e0e3d8843b9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825013621.2845700-5-seanjc@google.com>
On 8/24/23 20:36, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Treat EMULTYPE_SKIP failures on SEV guests as unhandleable emulation
> instead of simply resuming the guest, and drop the hack-a-fix which
> effects that behavior for the INT3/INTO injection path. If KVM can't
> skip an instruction for which KVM has already done partial emulation,
> resuming the guest is undesirable as doing so may corrupt guest state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 12 +-----------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 +++++++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 39ce680013c4..fc2cd5585349 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -364,8 +364,6 @@ static void svm_set_interrupt_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int mask)
> svm->vmcb->control.int_state |= SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK;
>
> }
> -static int svm_check_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
> - void *insn, int insn_len);
>
> static int __svm_skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> bool commit_side_effects)
> @@ -386,14 +384,6 @@ static int __svm_skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> if (!svm->next_rip) {
> - /*
> - * FIXME: Drop this when kvm_emulate_instruction() does the
> - * right thing and treats "can't emulate" as outright failure
> - * for EMULTYPE_SKIP.
> - */
> - if (svm_check_emulate_instruction(vcpu, EMULTYPE_SKIP, NULL, 0) != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (unlikely(!commit_side_effects))
> old_rflags = svm->vmcb->save.rflags;
>
> @@ -4752,7 +4742,7 @@ static int svm_check_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
> */
> if (unlikely(!insn)) {
> if (emul_type & EMULTYPE_SKIP)
> - return X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR;
> + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
Trying to follow this, bear with me...
This results in an "emulation failure" which fills out all the KVM
userspace exit information in prepare_emulation_failure_exit(). But
because of the return 0 in handle_emulation_failure(), in the end this
ends up just acting like the first patch because we exit out
svm_update_soft_interrupt_rip() early and the instruction just gets retried?
Thanks,
Tom
>
> kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
> return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index f897d582d560..1f4a8fbc5390 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -8858,8 +8858,13 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
> bool writeback = true;
>
> r = kvm_check_emulate_insn(vcpu, emulation_type, insn, insn_len);
> - if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> - return 1;
> + if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) {
> + if (r == X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR || r == X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT)
> + return 1;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(r != X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE);
> + return handle_emulation_failure(vcpu, emulation_type);
> + }
>
> vcpu->arch.l1tf_flush_l1d = true;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 1:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: SVM: Fix unexpected #UD on INT3 in SEV guests Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: SVM: Don't inject #UD if KVM attempts to skip SEV guest insn Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: SVM: Require nrips support for SEV guests (and beyond) Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: x86: Refactor can_emulate_instruction() return to be more expressive Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Treat all "skip" emulation for SEV guests as outright failures Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 13:43 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2023-08-25 14:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 19:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: SVM: Fix unexpected #UD on INT3 in SEV guests Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 21:31 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-10-05 1:29 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dddb2ef-e021-087d-f0ea-9e0e3d8843b9@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wuzongyo@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox