From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"bjorn@mork.no" <bjorn@mork.no>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] r8152: remove queuing rx packets in driver
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 05:11:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e03e260818940bcb37828eea83e0137@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50a8ec7dece0100c931fd187e19e14dd1ca1a0e9.camel@redhat.com>
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 9:39 PM
[...]
> One of the key points in Jakub's reply is that the burst must exceed
> the budget by a limited number of packets:
>
> "Nothing will explode if we process a few more packets than budget
> (assuming budget > 0)"
>
> How many packets can contain at most a single URB?
I think it depends on
1. if the packets coming continually
2. the size of the packet
The URB would be completed when
1. the device doesn't receive any packet during several us.
2. the desired size is reached.
For 2.5G NIC with the packets of 1514 bytes, a urb at most contains about 21 packets.
If all packet are 60 bytes, the number would be about 390.
If the average size of the packets is 488 bytes, the number is about 64.
> If that number can be significant greater then the napi budget, I think
> we are better off keeping the packet in the queue - otherwise the whole
> system latency/stability would be affected.
Should I go back the patch with queuing the rx packet in driver?
Best Regards,
Hayes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 3:13 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] r8152: modify rx_bottom Hayes Wang
2023-09-19 3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] r8152: remove queuing rx packets in driver Hayes Wang
2023-09-19 12:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-09-19 12:26 ` Hayes Wang
2023-09-21 13:39 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-09-22 5:11 ` Hayes Wang [this message]
2023-09-19 3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] r8152: use napi_gro_frags Hayes Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e03e260818940bcb37828eea83e0137@realtek.com \
--to=hayeswang@realtek.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox